Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:0
作者
Gyula Seres
Anna Helen Balleyer
Nicola Cerutti
Anastasia Danilov
Jana Friedrichsen
Yiming Liu
Müge Süer
机构
[1] Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin,
[2] University of Groningen,undefined
[3] Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change,undefined
[4] WZB Berlin Social Science Center,undefined
[5] Free University of Berlin,undefined
[6] Einstein Center Digital Future,undefined
[7] DIW,undefined
来源
Journal of the Economic Science Association | 2021年 / 7卷
关键词
COVID-19; Health policy; Face masks; Risk compensation; Social signaling; Field experiment; JEL Classification; C93; D9; I12;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Governments across the world have implemented restrictive policies to slow the spread of COVID-19. Recommended face mask use has been a controversially discussed policy, among others, due to potential adverse effects on physical distancing. Using a randomized field experiment (N = 300), we show that individuals kept a significantly larger distance from someone wearing a face mask than from an unmasked person during the early days of the pandemic. According to an additional survey experiment (N = 456) conducted at the time, masked individuals were not perceived as being more infectious than unmasked ones, but they were believed to prefer more distancing. This result suggests that wearing a mask served as a social signal that led others to increase the distance they kept. Our findings provide evidence against the claim that mask use creates a false sense of security that would negatively affect physical distancing. Furthermore, our results suggest that behavior has informational content that may be affected by policies.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 158
页数:19
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [11] Jensen R(2015)Social signals of safety and risk confer utility and have asymmetric effects on observers’ choices Nature Neuroscience 55 591-843
  • [12] Bursztyn L(2004)Social influence: Compliance and conformity Annual Review of Psychology 85 828-172
  • [13] Ederer F(2003)The effects of mandatory seat belt laws on driving behavior and traffic fatalities Review of Economics and Statistics 4 165-308
  • [14] Ferman B(2007)Risk compensation in HIV prevention: implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies Current HIV/AIDS Reports 5 293-73
  • [15] Cameron AC(2020)To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the covid-19 pandemic Infectious Disease Modelling 4 61-436
  • [16] Gelbach JB(1991)Risk reduction or risk compensation? the case of mandatory safety-belt use laws Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8 434-936
  • [17] Miller DL(2020)Rational use of face masks in the covid-19 pandemic The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 12 852-2047
  • [18] Canning D(2021)Heterogeneity in risk-taking during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from the uk lockdown Frontiers in psychology 88 913-793
  • [19] Karra M(2007)Risk compensation or risk reduction? seatbelts, state laws, and traffic fatalities Social Science Quarterly 47 2025-416
  • [20] Dayalu R(2013)Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review Quality & Quantity 22 773-645