Forest Cover Change, Physiography, Local Economy, and Institutions in a Mountain Watershed in Nepal

被引:0
作者
Ambika P. Gautam
Ganesh P. Shivakoti
Edward L. Webb
机构
[1] Asian Institute of Technology,School of Environment, Resources and Development
[2] P.O. Box 4 Klong Luang Pathum Thani 12120,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2004年 / 33卷
关键词
Land cover changes; Remote sensing; GIS; Institutions; Land tenure; Nepal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study assessed changes in forest cover in a mountain watershed in central Nepal between 1976 and 2000 by comparing classified satellite images coupled by GIS analyses, and examined the association of forest change with major physiographic, economic, and local forest governance parameters. The results showed an increase in forested area (forest plus shrublands) by 7.6% during 1976–2000. Forest dynamism (changes including improvement, deterioration, gain, and loss) was highest in low-elevation, south-facing and less-steep slopes that were closer to roads. Proportionately the highest net improvement and gain to forested area also took place in those locations. Forest degradation occurred at twice the rate of improvement in high elevation areas (> 2300 m). Forests located in urban and semiurban areas (i.e., a market-oriented economy) experienced a proportionately higher amount of net improvement and gain than forests in rural areas (i.e., a subsistence economy). Among the three governance arrangements, proportionately the highest net improvement and gain took place in semigovernment forests (forested area legally under the forest department but with de facto control and claim of ownership by local communities and/or municipality) followed by formalized community forests (including leasehold). Government forests, which were mostly found in the southern high mountains and had virtually open access, remained relatively stable during the study period. Over 50% of the watershed forests have not come under community-based management despite favorable policy and more than two decades of government intervention with continuous donor support. The findings indicate that the present “one size fits all” approach of community forest handover policy in Nepal needs rethinking to accommodate biophysical and socioeconomic variations across the country.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 61
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Agrawal A.(2001)Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society 29 485-514
[2]  
Ostrom E.(1983)Fuel, food or forest? Dilemmas in a Nepali village. World Development 11 1057-1074
[3]  
Bajracharya D.(1992)A review of community forestry advances in Nepal. Commonwealth Forestry Review 71 95-100
[4]  
Bartlett A. G.(1993)Tropical forests and global carbon cycle: the need for sustainable land-use patterns. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 46 31-44
[5]  
Brown S.(2002)Capital formation and sustainable community forestry in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 22 70-77
[6]  
Dongol C. M.(1995)Land use and landscape dynamics in Northern Thailand: Assessing change in three upland watersheds. Ambio 24 3281-334
[7]  
Hughey K. F. D.(2001)Species diversity and forest structure of pine plantations in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Banko Jankari 11 131-21
[8]  
Bigsby H. R.(2002)GIS assessment of land use/land cover changes associated with community forestry implementation in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 22 63-69
[9]  
Fox J.(1993)High altitude forests in the Middle Hills: can they be managed as community forests? Banko Janakari 4 20-23
[10]  
Krummel J.(1998)Land-use changes in two Middle Hill districts of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 18 193-212