Eye gaze of endoscopists during simulated colonoscopy

被引:0
作者
Wenjing He
Simon Bryns
Karen Kroeker
Anup Basu
Daniel Birch
Bin Zheng
机构
[1] University of Alberta,Surgical Simulation Research Lab, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
[2] University of Alberta,2
[3] University of Alberta,40 Zeidler Ledcor Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine
[4] University of Alberta,Department of Computing Science
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
Endoscopy; Eye Movements; Training; Orientation; Competence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Regaining orientation during an endoscopic procedure is critical. We investigated how endoscopists maintain orientation based on video and eye gaze analysis. Novices and experts performed a simulated colonoscopy procedure. Task performance was assessed by completion time, total distance traveled, maximum depth of insertion, percentage of mucosa viewed, and air insufflation volume. Procedure videos were analyzed by transfers among three viewing areas: center of bowel lumen, edge of bowel lumen, and other structure without bowel lumen in sight. Performers’ gaze features were also examined over these viewing areas. Experts required less time to complete the procedure (P < 0.001). Novices’ scope traveled a greater distance (P < 0.001) and more scope was inserted compared to an expert (P < 0.001). Novices also insufflated more air than experts (P < 0.001). Experts maintained the view of bowel lumen in the middle of the screen, while novices often left it on the edge (P = 0.032). When disorientation happened, novices brought the view to the edge more frequently than the center. However, experts were able to bring it back to the center directly. Eye tracking showed that the rate of saccades in experts increased when the bowel lumen moved away from the central view, such a behavior was not observed in novices. Maintaining a centered view of the bowel lumen is a strategy used by expert endoscopists. Video and eye tracking analysis revealed a key difference in eye gaze behavior when regaining orientation between novice and experienced endoscopists.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 143
页数:6
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Varadarajulu S(2011)GI endoscopes Gastrointest Endosc 74 e6-615
[2]  
Banerjee S(2016)Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review Gut 65 607-450
[3]  
Barth BA(2012)Quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopy Curr Opin Gastroenterol 28 442-253
[4]  
Desilets DJ(2003)The advantages and disadvantages of endoscopy Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 18 250-172
[5]  
Kaul V(2000)Disorientation in minimal access surgery: a case study HFES Ann Meet Proc 44 169-997
[6]  
Kethu SR(2007)Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients Surg Endosc 21 994-1906
[7]  
Pedrosa MC(2008)Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice Gastroenterology 135 1899-1417
[8]  
Pfau PR(2007)Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21 1413-12
[9]  
Tokar JL(2014)Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training World J Gastrointest Endosc 6 6-464
[10]  
Wang A(2002)Virtual Reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded Study Ann Surg 236 458-1204