Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for complex portfolio optimization problems

被引:36
作者
Anagnostopoulos K.P. [1 ]
Mamanis G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Production and Management Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi
关键词
Multiobjective optimization; NSGA-II; PESA; Portfolio selection; SPEA2;
D O I
10.1007/s10287-009-0113-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper investigates the ability of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs), namely the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm (PESA) and Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2), for solving complex portfolio optimization problems. The portfolio optimization problem is a typical bi-objective optimization problem with objectives the reward that should be maximized and the risk that should be minimized. While reward is commonly measured by the portfolio's expected return, various risk measures have been proposed that try to better reflect a portfolio's riskiness or to simplify the problem to be solved with exact optimization techniques efficiently. However, some risk measures generate additional complexities, since they are non-convex, non-differentiable functions. In addition, constraints imposed by the practitioners introduce further difficulties since they transform the search space into a non-convex region. The results show that MOEAs, in general, are efficient and reliable strategies for this kind of problems, and their performance is independent of the risk function used. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 279
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Acerbi C., Tasche D., Expected shortfall: a natural coherent alternative to value at risk, Economic Notes by Banca Monte Dei Paschi Di Siena SpA, 31, 2, pp. 379-388, (2002)
[2]  
Anagnostopoulos K.P., Chatzoglou P.D., Katsavounis S., A reactive Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure for a mixed integer portfolio optimization problem, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on accounting and finance in transition (CD), (2004)
[3]  
Armananzas R., Lozano J.A., A multiobjective approach to the portfolio optimization problem, IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, 2, pp. 1388-1395, (2005)
[4]  
Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J.M., Heath D., Coherent measures of risk, Math Finance, 9, 3, pp. 203-228, (1999)
[5]  
Benati S., Rizzi R., A mixed integer linear programming formulation of the optimal mean/Value-at-Risk portfolio problem, Eur J Oper Res, 176, pp. 423-434, (2007)
[6]  
Bonissone P.P., Subbu R., Eklund N., Kiehl T.R., Evolutionary Algorithms + Domain Knowledge = Real-World Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Trans Evol Comput, 10, 3, pp. 256-280, (2006)
[7]  
Branke J., Scheckenbach B., Stein M., Deb K., Schmeck H., Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, Eur J Oper Res, 199, 3, pp. 684-693, (2009)
[8]  
Chang T.J., Meade N., Beasley J.E., Sharaiha Y.M., Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization, Comput Oper Res, 27, pp. 1271-1302, (2000)
[9]  
Chiam S.C., Tan K.C., Mamum A., Evolutionary multi-objective portfolio optimization in practical context, Int J Autom Comput, 5, 1, pp. 67-80, (2008)
[10]  
Coello C.A.C., An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques, ACM Comput Surv, 32, 2, pp. 109-143, (2000)