Evaluation of surgical strategy of conventional vs. percutaneous robot-assisted spinal trans-pedicular instrumentation in spondylodiscitis

被引:78
作者
Keric N. [1 ]
Eum D.J. [1 ,2 ]
Afghanyar F. [1 ]
Rachwal-Czyzewicz I. [3 ,4 ]
Renovanz M. [1 ]
Conrad J. [1 ]
Wesp D.M.A. [1 ]
Kantelhardt S.R. [1 ]
Giese A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, Mainz
[2] Department of Neurosurgery, German Red Cross-Pain Center, Mainz
[3] Institute of Neuroradiology, University of Mainz, Mainz
[4] Radiology Institute, Gdansk
关键词
Pedicle screws; Percutaneous spinal instrumentation; Robot-assisted surgery; Spondylodiscitis;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-016-0597-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robot-assisted percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws is a recent technique demonstrating high accuracy. The optimal treatment for spondylodiscitis is still a matter of debate. We performed a retrospective cohort study on surgical patients treated with pedicle screw/rod placement alone without the application of intervertebral cages. In this collective, we compare conventional open to a further minimalized percutaneous robot-assisted spinal instrumentation, avoiding a direct contact of implants and infectious focus. 90 records and CT scans of patients treated by dorsal transpedicular instrumentation of the infected segments with and without decompression and antibiotic therapy were analysed for clinical and radiological outcome parameters. 24 patients were treated by free-hand fluoroscopy-guided surgery (121 screws), and 66 patients were treated by percutaneous robot-assisted spinal instrumentation (341 screws). Accurate screw placement was confirmed in 90 % of robot-assisted and 73.5 % of free-hand placed screws. Implant revision due to misplacement was necessary in 4.95 % of the free-hand group compared to 0.58 % in the robot-assisted group. The average intraoperative X-ray exposure per case was 0.94 ± 1.04 min in the free-hand group vs. 0.4 ± 0.16 min in the percutaneous group (p = 0.000). Intraoperative adverse events were observed in 12.5 % of free-hand placed pedicle screws and 6.1 % of robot robot-assisted screws. The mean postoperative hospital stay in the free-hand group was 18.1 ± 12.9 days, and in percutaneous group, 13.8 ± 5.6 days (p = 0.012). This study demonstrates that the robot-guided insertion of pedicle screws is a safe and effective procedure in lumbar and thoracic spondylodiscitis with higher accuracy of implant placement, lower radiation dose, and decreased complication rates. Percutaneous spinal dorsal instrumentation seems to be sufficient to treat lumbar and thoracic spondylodiscitis. © 2016, Springer-Verlag London.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Devito D.P., Kaplan L., Dietl R., Pfeiffer M., Horne D., Silberstein B., Hardenbrook M., Kiriyanthan G., Barzilay Y., Bruskin A., Sackerer D., Alexandrovsky V., Stuer C., Bruger R., Maeurer J., Donald G.D., Schoenmayr R., Friedlander A., Knoller N., Schmieder K., Pechlivanis I., Kim I.S., Meyer B., Shoham M., Clinical acceptance and accuracy of spinal implants guided with spine assist surgical robot, Spine, 35, pp. 2109-2115, (2010)
[2]  
Kantelhardt S.R., Martinez R., Baerwinkel S., Burger R., Giese A., Rohde V., Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robot-guided, pedicle screw placement, Eur Spine J, 20, pp. 860-868, (2011)
[3]  
Pechlivanis I., Kiriyanthan G., Engelhardt M., Scholz M., Lucke S., Harders A., Schmieder K., Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system, Spine, 34, 4, pp. 392-398, (2009)
[4]  
Schoenmayr R., Kim I., Why do I use and recommend the use of navigation, ArgoSpine News J, 22, 4, pp. 132-135, (2010)
[5]  
Van Dijk J.D., van den Ende R.P., Stramigioli S., Kochling M., Hoss N., Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery, Spine, 40, 17, pp. E986-E991, (2015)
[6]  
Sur A., Tsang K., Brown M., Tzerakis N., Management of adult spontaneous spondylodiscitis and its rising incidence, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 97, 6, pp. 451-455, (2015)
[7]  
Marquez Sanchez P., Spondylodiscitis. Radiologia. doi:10.1016/j.rx.2015.12.005, (Epub ahead of print), (2016)
[8]  
Hadjipavlou A.G., Mader J.T., Necessary J.T., Muffoletto A.J., Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management, Spine, 25, pp. 1668-1679, (2000)
[9]  
Mylona E., Samarkos M., Kakalou E., Fanourgiakis P., Skoutelis A., Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: a systemic review of clinical characteristics, Semin Arthritis Rheum, 39, 1, pp. 10-17, (2009)
[10]  
Krodel A., Kruger A., Lohscheidt K., Pfahler M., Refior H.J., Anterior debridement, fusion, and extrafocal stabilization in the treatment of osteomyelitis of the spine, J Spinal Dis, 12, pp. 17-26, (1999)