Using dynamic models to support inferences of insider threat risk

被引:0
作者
Paul J. Sticha
Elise T. Axelrad
机构
[1] Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO),
来源
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory | 2016年 / 22卷
关键词
Insider threat; Insider sabotage; System dynamics; Bayesian belief network; Dynamic simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two modeling approaches were integrated to address the problem of predicting the risk of an attack by a particular insider. We present a system dynamics model that incorporates psychological factors including personality, attitude and counterproductive behaviors to simulate the pathway to insider attack. Multiple runs of the model that sampled the population of possible personalities under different conditions resulted in simulated cases representing a wide range of employees of an organization. We then structured a Bayesian belief network to predict attack risk, incorporating important variables from the system dynamics model and learning the conditional probabilities from the simulated cases. Three scenarios were considered for comparison of risk indicators: An average employee (i.e., one who scores at the mean of a number of personality variables), an openly disgruntled malicious insider, and a disgruntled malicious insider who decides to conceal bad behaviors. The counterintuitive result is that employees who act out less than expected, given their particular level of disgruntlement, can present a greater risk of being malicious than other employees who exhibit a higher level of counterproductive behavior. This result should be tempered, however, considering the limited grounding of some of the model parameters. Nevertheless, this approach to integrating system dynamics modeling and Bayesian belief networks to address an insider threat problem demonstrates the potential for powerful prediction and detection capability in support of insider threat risk mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 381
页数:31
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Castillo E(1998)Modeling probabilistic networks of discrete and continuous variables J Multivar Anal 64 48-65
[2]  
Gutiérrez JM(1989)Clinical versus actuarial judgment Science 243 1668-1674
[3]  
Hadi AS(2015)When the cat’s away, some mice will play: a basic trait account of dishonest behavior J Res Pers 57 72-88
[4]  
Dawes RM(2006)The ‘dark triad’ of psychopathy and normal personality traits Pers Individ Differ 40 331-339
[5]  
Faust D(2011)Defection in the dark? A randomized response investigation of cooperativeness in social dilemma games Euro J Soc Psychol 41 638-644
[6]  
Meehl P(2006)Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effects of job satisfaction Pers Psychol 59 591-622
[7]  
Hilbig BE(2002)The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism and psychopathy J Res Pers 36 556-563
[8]  
Zettler I(1974)An opponent-process theory of motivation: i Temporal Dyn Affect Psychol Rev 81 119-145
[9]  
Jakobwitz S(2013)Beyond rational choice: the hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making Psychol Crime Law 19 745-763
[10]  
Egan V(2012)Modeling the mind and the milieu: computational modeling for micro-level organizational researchers Organ Res Methods 15 602-623