Teaching, learning and assessment methods for sustainability education on the land–sea interface

被引:0
作者
Andreas C. Bryhn
Andrea Belgrano
机构
[1] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Coastal Research
[2] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research
[3] University of Gothenburg,Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment (SIME)
来源
Discover Sustainability | / 4卷
关键词
Land–sea interface; Sustainability; Teaching and learning methods; Learner-centered;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Land–Sea Interface (LSI) is where land and sea meet, not only in physical terms, but also with regards to a large variety of ecological and societal aspects. The United Nations has proclaimed the period 2021–2030 the Ocean Decade, which entails striving for a sustainable use of the ocean and teaching and learning about ocean related issues. Teaching and learning about the LSI are also tightly connected with several Sustainable Development Goals (Global Goals) such as Life Below Water, Zero Hunger and Sustainable Cities and Communities. Teaching and learning about sustainability lacks a uniform pedagogy, and it is probably wise to maintain that apparently adaptive diversity. In this globally relevant methods overview, we present a wide range of relatively new and/or successful and mostly largely learner-centered methods. We also discuss how effective and popular they are, and give examples on how most of these methods are already used in LSI sustainability teaching. There will probably not be any successful “one size fits all” model developing for LSI teaching and learning, and each module, course and programme will have to develop its own recipe for successful teaching and learning, possibly with support from one or several methods discussed in this paper.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 271 条
  • [1] Choudary SK(2008)Higher education in India: a socio-historical journey from ancient period to 2006–2007 J Educ Enquiry 8 50-72
  • [2] Allen M(2002)Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: a meta-analysis Am J Distance Educ 16 83-97
  • [3] Bourhis J(2020)A study on shift of traditional classroom methods to online teaching methods in higher education Int J Multidiscip Res Dev 7 96-100
  • [4] Burrell N(2021)Exploring transition in higher education: engagement and challenges in moving from teacher-centered to student-centered learning J Problem Based Learn High Educ 9 113-30
  • [5] Mabry E(2003)Foundations for learner-centered education: a knowledge base Education 124 5-16
  • [6] Thangajesu Satsish M(1996)Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment High Educ 32 347-64
  • [7] Sornaganesh V(2016)Constructive alignment in economics teaching: a reflection on effective implementation Teach High Educ 22 336-48
  • [8] Sudha G(2022)Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning Act Learn High Educ 23 217-31
  • [9] Chellama AV(2021)Reclaiming constructive alignment Eur J High Educ 11 119-36
  • [10] Awacorach J(2006)Learning outcomes in higher education Stud High Educ 21 93-108