“It’s making contacts”: notions of social capital and implications for widening access to medical education

被引:0
作者
S. Nicholson
J. A. Cleland
机构
[1] Queen Mary University of London,Institute of Health Science Education, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
[2] University of Aberdeen,Division of Medical and Dental Education
来源
Advances in Health Sciences Education | 2017年 / 22卷
关键词
Lower socio-economic groups; Meritocracy; Social capital; Undergraduate medical education; Under-representation; Weak ties, bridging and linking capital; Widening access;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the UK widening access (WA) activities and policies aim to increase the representation from lower socio-economic groups into Higher Education. Whilst linked to a political rhetoric of inclusive education such initiatives have however failed to significantly increase the number of such students entering medicine. This is compounded by a discourse that portrays WA applicants and students as lacking the essential skills or attributes to be successful in medical education. Much of the research in this area to date has been weak and it is critical to better understand how WA applicants and students negotiate medical admissions and education to inform change. To address this gap we amalgamated a larger dataset from three qualitative studies of student experiences of WA to medicine (48 participants in total). Inductively analysing the findings using social capital as a theoretical lens we created and clustered codes into categories, informed by the concepts of “weak ties” and “bridging and linking capital”, terms used by previous workers in this field, to better understand student journeys in medical education. Successful applicants from lower socio-economic groups recognise and mobilise weak ties to create linking capital. However once in medical school these students seem less aware of the need for, or how to create, capital effectively. We argue WA activities should support increasing the social capital of under-represented applicants and students, and future selection policy needs to take into account the varying social capital of students, so as to not overtly disadvantage some social groups.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 490
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Balmer DF(2015)How students experience and navigate transitions in undergraduate medical education: an application of Bourdieu’s theoretical model Advances in Health Sciences Education 20 1073-1085
[2]  
Richards BF(2015)Widening participation in medicine: moving beyond the numbers Medical Education 49 15-17
[3]  
Varpio L(2007)Changing geographies of access to medical education in London Health and Place 13 520-531
[4]  
Baxter C(2008)Diversifying the medical classroom: is more evidence needed? JAMA 300 1203-1204
[5]  
Baxter D(2007)Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research Qualitative Health Research 17 1316-1328
[6]  
Baxter M(1988)Social capital in the creation of human capital American Journal of Sociology 94 95-120
[7]  
Brown G(2004)Families, social capital and educational outcomes British Journal of Educational Studies 52 390-416
[8]  
Garlick P(2012)Improving diversity through strategic planning: a 10-year (2002–2012) experience at the medical university of South Carolina Academic Medicine 87 1548-1555
[9]  
Carrasquillo O(2004)Untying the Gordian knot of social inheritance Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 21 115-138
[10]  
Lee-Rey ET(2015)Ensuring a fair and equitable selection of students to serve society’s health care needs Medical Education 49 84-92