Effectiveness and safety of bulking agents versus surgical methods in women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[1] Dyer O(2016)Johnson and Johnson faces lawsuit over vaginal mesh devices BMJ 353 i3045-310

[2] Keltie K(2017)Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8-year study of 92,246 women Sci Rep 7 12015-528

[3] Elneil S(2018)Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8 CD013108-640

[4] Monga A(2019)Particulate versus non-particulate bulking agents in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence Res Rep Urol 11 299-213

[5] Baessler K(2016)Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: a FIGO working group report Neurourol Urodyn 36 518-378

[6] Christmann-Schmid C(2017)Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997–2016: a population-based cohort study Lancet 389 629-601

[7] Maher C(2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews BMJ 372 n71-1391

[8] Haya N(2004)Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205-102

[9] Crawford TJ(2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ 366 l4898-398

[10] Brown J(2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions BMJ 355 i4919-345

[1] Dyer O(2016)Johnson and Johnson faces lawsuit over vaginal mesh devices BMJ 353 i3045-310

[2] Keltie K(2017)Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8-year study of 92,246 women Sci Rep 7 12015-528

[3] Elneil S(2018)Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8 CD013108-640

[4] Monga A(2019)Particulate versus non-particulate bulking agents in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence Res Rep Urol 11 299-213

[5] Baessler K(2016)Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: a FIGO working group report Neurourol Urodyn 36 518-378

[6] Christmann-Schmid C(2017)Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997–2016: a population-based cohort study Lancet 389 629-601

[7] Maher C(2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews BMJ 372 n71-1391

[8] Haya N(2004)Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205-102

[9] Crawford TJ(2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ 366 l4898-398

[10] Brown J(2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions BMJ 355 i4919-345