Tamsulosin Monotherapy Is Effective in Reducing Ureteral Stent-related Symptoms: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies

被引:0
作者
Yong-bo Chen
Liang Gao
Qing Jiang
Ke Ran
Run-tian Luo
机构
[1] the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Department of Urology
来源
Current Medical Science | 2019年 / 39卷
关键词
tamsulosin; solifenacin; ureteral stent-related symptoms; meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tamsulosin monotherapy for the treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs) and compare it with that of solifenacin monotherapy and combined therapy of tamsulosin and silifenacin. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated the effectiveness of tamsulosin for the treatment of SRSs, were searched from the databases PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library published up to November 2018. Eight RCTs involving 1087 participants were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that tamsulosin monotherapy could significantly decrease the urinary symptoms [mean difference (MD) −7.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−11.47, −3.65), P=0.0001] and body pain [MD −5.25, 95% CI (−8.03, −2.46), P=0.0002], and improve the sexual performance [MD −1.06, 95% CI (−1.89, −0.24), P=0.01] compared with the control group. Moreover, there was no significant difference between tamsulosin monotherapy and solifenacin monotherapy in all outcomes except for significantly better sexual performance in solifenacin group [MD 0.29, 95% CI (0.06, 0.51), P=0.01]. In addition, the effectiveness of combined therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin was not superior to that of tamsulosin monotherapy. Our study demonstrated that tamsulosin monotherapy was effective for the treatment of patients with SRSs; evident superiority could not be found for therapy of tamsulosin and solifenacin combined.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 718
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Chew BH(2004)The use of stents in contemporary urology Curr Opin Urol 14 111-115
[2]  
Knudsen BE(2004)Ureteric stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study assessing symptoms and complications BJU Int 93 1032-1034
[3]  
Denstedt JD(1967)Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically J Urol 97 840-844
[4]  
Jeong H(2015)The use of internal stents in chronic ureteral obstruction J Urol 193 1092-1100
[5]  
Kwak C(2002)Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents Urology 59 511-516
[6]  
Lee SE(2006)Self-retaining ureteral stents: analysis of factors responsible for patients’discomfort J Endourol 20 33-37
[7]  
Zimskind PD(2016)Impact of ureteral stenting in ureteroscopy Curr Opin Urol 26 76-80
[8]  
Fetter TR(2015)Effects of alpha-Blockers, Antimuscarinics, or Combination Therapy in Relieving Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis J Endourol 29 650-656
[9]  
Wilkerson JL(2017)The role of solifenacin, as monotherapy or combination with tamsulosin in ureteral stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis World J Urol 35 1669-1680
[10]  
Fiuk J(2017)PRISMA-combined alpha-blockers and antimuscarinics for ureteral stent-related symptoms: A meta-analysis Medicine 96 e6098-1840