Exploring the effects of AI literacy in teacher learning: an empirical study

被引:27
作者
Du, Hua [1 ]
Sun, Yanchao [1 ]
Jiang, Haozhe [2 ]
Islam, A. Y. M. Atiquil [3 ,4 ]
Gu, Xiaoqing [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Key Lab Intelligent Educ Technol & Applicat Zheji, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Educ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] East China Normal Univ, Dept Educ Informat Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Teacher Educ, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
SELF-EFFICACY; USER ACCEPTANCE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; SUBJECTIVE NORM; TECHNOLOGY; EDUCATION; ATTITUDES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-03101-6
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As most practitioners (including teachers) do not know how AI functions and cannot make full use of AI in education, there is an urgent need to investigate teachers' intentions to learn AI and related determinants so as to promote their AI learning. This study collected survey data from a total of 318 K-12 teachers from sixteen provinces or municipalities in China. A two-step structural equation modeling approach was performed to analyze the data. Our findings show that K-12 teachers' perceptions of the use of AI for social good and self-efficacy in learning AI are two direct determinants of behavioral intentions to learn AI, while awareness of AI ethics and AI literacy are two indirect ones. AI literacy has a direct impact on perceptions of the use of AI for social good, self-efficacy in learning AI and awareness of AI ethics and has an indirect impact on behavioral intentions to learn AI. This study represents one of the earliest attempts to empirically examine the power of AI literacy and explore the determinants of behavioral intentions to learn AI among K-12 teachers. Our findings can theoretically and practically contribute to the virgin field of K-12 teachers' AI learning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1985, From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior, P11
[3]   User acceptance of social learning systems in higher education: an application of the extended Technology Acceptance Model [J].
Akman, Ibrahim ;
Turhan, Cigdem .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 54 (03) :229-237
[4]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[6]   SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) :122-147
[7]   A study of Chinese technical and vocational college teachers' adoption and gratification in new technologies [J].
Bin, Enlin ;
Islam, A. Y. M. Atiquil ;
Gu, Xiaoqing ;
Spector, Jonathan Michael ;
Wang, FaLiang .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 51 (06) :2359-2375
[8]   Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education [J].
Jason Borenstein ;
Ayanna Howard .
AI and Ethics, 2021, 1 (1) :61-65
[9]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[10]   The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research [J].
Celik, Ismail ;
Dindar, Muhterem ;
Muukkonen, Hanni ;
Jarvela, Sanna .
TECHTRENDS, 2022, 66 (04) :616-630