Environmental management systems in the architectural, engineering and construction sectors: a roadmap to aid the delivery of the sustainable development goals

被引:0
作者
Rosemary Horry
Colin A. Booth
Abdul–Majeed Mahamadu
Patrick Manu
Panos Georgakis
机构
[1] University of Derby,The College of Science and Engineering
[2] University of the West of England (UWE),Centre for Architecture and Built Environment Research (CABER), Faculty of Environment and Technology
[3] University of Manchester,Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering
[4] University of Wolverhampton,Faculty of Science and Engineering
来源
Environment, Development and Sustainability | 2022年 / 24卷
关键词
ISO 14001; PRISMA; Sustainability; Corporate social responsibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Realisation of the sustainable development goals (SDGs) will provide improvements to people's lives and longevity of the planet. The architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) sectors have a potentially huge role in aiding the delivery of many SDGs; however, there appears to be a lack of research into the engagement within this sector. The leading environmental management system (EMS), ISO 14001, can enable organisations in the AEC sectors to improve their business operations, whilst minimising their impacts on the environment and improving society. Therefore, the study sets out to use institutional theory to determine the usefulness of ISO 14001 as a tool within the AEC sector and to demonstrate how the organisational benefits could facilitate the delivery of the SDGs. A stepwise PRISMA review process facilitated the compiling of academic articles and professional reports (n = 44), which enabled the creation of an inventory of the perceived benefits (n = 85) and the recognised barriers (n = 63) to implementing ISO 14001 across the AEC sectors. These barriers and benefits were confirmed by environmental practitioners as being relevant to the incorporation of an EMS. The most widely reported benefits within the AEC sectors were improving environmental performance and compliance with legislation. Lack of government pressure and lack of expertise were the most widely reported barriers, followed by cost to AEC organisations utilising an EMS. Following on from this inventory of benefits, it was possible to develop of a conceptual roadmap, which illustrates where linkages exist with the SDGs. SDG 4, 8, 12 and 13 are shown as exhibiting the most associations with the benefits. This roadmap was reviewed by AEC sector professionals who confirmed its usefulness. Therefore, it is surmised that the roadmap could aid strategic organisational sustainable planning or for organisations to demonstrate the delivery of their corporate social responsibilities.
引用
收藏
页码:10585 / 10615
页数:30
相关论文
共 233 条
[1]  
Abanda H(2015)A critical analysis of building information modelling systems used in construction projects Advances in Engineering Software 90 183-201
[2]  
Vidalakis C(2010)The implementation of ISO 14001 environmental management system in manufacturing firms in Malaysia Asian Social Sciences 6 100-107
[3]  
Oti AH(2019)The unwritten history of green building rating tools: A personal view from some of the ‘founding fathers’ Building Research & Information 48 1-17
[4]  
Tah JHM(2018)Assessing the contribution of water and energy efficiency in green buildings to achieve United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in Jordan Building and Environment 146 119-132
[5]  
Abdullah H(2019)Prioritising SDG targets: Assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages Sustainability Science 14 421-438
[6]  
Fuong CC(2012)ISO 14001: Motivations and benefits in the Italian metal industry International Journal of Engineering Business Management 4 1-9
[7]  
Ade R(2008)Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? A case for environmental management systems Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53 281-295
[8]  
Rehm M(2003)Critical factors for implementing ISO 14001 standard in United States industrial companies Journal of Cleaner Production 11 749-752
[9]  
Alawneh R(2020)Opinions of small and medium UK construction companies on environmental management systems Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers- Management, Procurement and Law. ICE Publications. 174 23-34
[10]  
Mohamed Ghazali FE(2002)Can ISO 14001 and eco–labelling turn the construction industry green?" Building and Environment 37 421-428