Behavioral effects and anticonvulsant efficacies of low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA antagonists in mice

被引:0
|
作者
Beth Geter-Douglass
J. M. Witkin
机构
[1] Drug Development Group,
[2] NIDA Addiction Research Center,undefined
[3] NIH,undefined
[4] 5500 Nathan Shock Drive,undefined
[5] Baltimore,undefined
[6] MD 21224,undefined
[7] USA e-mail: jwitkin@intra.nida.nih.gov,undefined
[8] Tel.: +1-410-5501586,undefined
[9] Fax: +1-410-5501648,undefined
[10] Present address: BPRU,undefined
[11] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,undefined
[12] 5510 Nathan Shock Drive,undefined
[13] Baltimore,undefined
[14] MD 21224,undefined
[15] USA,undefined
来源
Psychopharmacology | 1999年 / 146卷
关键词
Key words NMDA antagonist; Discriminative stimulus effect; Locomotor activity; Convulsion; Mice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: It has been hypothesized that low-affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists may have therapeutic efficacy (e.g., in epilepsy, stroke, drug dependence) without the adverse side effects associated with high-affinity ligands (e.g., dizocilpine, phencyclidine). Objectives: To determine whether low-affinity NMDA antagonists have a larger predicted therapeutic window than high-affinity ligands. Methods: In Swiss-Webster mice, we compared the effects of uncompetitive antagonists having a range of affinities for the NMDA receptor ion channel [dizocilpine, memantine, ibogaine, amantadine and 5-aminocarbonyl-10,11-dihydro-5h-dibenzo[a,d] cyclohepten-5,10-imine (ADCI)] in three behavioral assays typically used to assess NMDA receptor antagonism. Behavioral side effects were compared with the efficacy of the compounds to protect against NMDA-induced seizures. Results: Only dizocilpine and memantine substituted fully in mice trained to discriminate dizocilpine from saline. Dizocilpine (Ki ∼0.003 µM) protected against NMDA-induced convulsions at doses that produced ataxia and stimulation of locomotor activity. Conversely, memantine (Ki ∼0.54 µM) prevented convulsions at doses that were 8- to 18-fold lower than those producing ataxia or effects on locomotion, respectively. Indeed, in contrast to dizocilpine, memantine did not stimulate locomotor activity but only produced dose-dependent reductions. The low-affinity antagonists ibogaine (Ki ∼1 µM) and ADCI (Ki ∼11 µM) protected against convulsions at doses that produced significant dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects, ataxia and decreases in locomotor activity. Amantadine (Ki ∼11 µM) was ineffective against NMDA-induced convulsions up to doses that produced significant behavioral side effects. Conclusions: These findings indicate that only certain low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA antagonists (e.g., memantine) may have therapeutic efficacy at doses that do not produce an adverse side-effect profile. For other therapeutic endpoints, different estimates of efficacy and safety require derivation.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavioral effects and anticonvulsant efficacies of low-affinity, uncompetitive NMDA antagonists in mice
    Geter-Douglass, B
    Witkin, JM
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 146 (03) : 280 - 289
  • [2] Dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects of low-affinity uncompetitive NMDA antagonists
    Grant, KA
    Colombo, G
    Grant, J
    Rogawski, MA
    NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 35 (12) : 1709 - 1719
  • [3] Uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists - Is low affinity better?
    Danysz, W
    Lanthorn, TH
    AMINO ACIDS, 2000, 19 (01) : 131 - 132
  • [4] New therapeutic perspectives with low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonists
    Kornhuber, J
    Weller, M
    NERVENARZT, 1996, 67 (01): : 77 - 82
  • [5] Effect of low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonists on electrical activity in mouse cortical slices
    Naish, HJ
    Marsh, WL
    Davies, JA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 443 (1-3) : 79 - 83
  • [6] Low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonists - The neuroprotective potential of ARL 15896AR
    Palmer, GC
    Miller, JA
    Cregan, EF
    Gendron, P
    Peeling, J
    NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENTS - THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 1997, 825 : 220 - 231
  • [7] Low affinity channel blocking (uncompetitive) NMDA receptor antagonists as therapeutic agents – toward an understanding of their favorable tolerability
    M. A. Rogawski
    Amino Acids, 2000, 19 : 133 - 149
  • [8] Low affinity channel blocking (uncompetitive) NMDA receptor antagonists as therapeutic agents - toward an understanding of their favorable tolerability
    Rogawski, MA
    AMINO ACIDS, 2000, 19 (01) : 133 - 149
  • [9] Case series: Antidepressant effects of low-affinity and low-trapping NMDA receptor antagonists did not predict response to ketamine in seven subjects
    Lepow, Lauren
    Luckenbaugh, David A.
    Park, Lawrence
    Henter, Ioline D.
    Zarate, Carlos A., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2017, 86 : 55 - 57
  • [10] BEHAVIORAL-EFFECTS OF NMDA ANTAGONISTS
    KOEK, W
    WOODS, JH
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1987, 28 (01) : 130 - 130