Indebtedness in family-managed firms: the moderating role of female directors on the board

被引:0
作者
P. López-Delgado
J. Diéguez-Soto
机构
[1] Statistics and Econometrics Department,Finances and Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Sciences
[2] University of Málaga,undefined
来源
Review of Managerial Science | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
Family management; Female directors; Indebtedness; Critical mass; Private firm; G32; L26;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the analysis of capital structure has motivated a huge amount of literature within the field of finance, much is still unrevealed regarding how and why managers decide to get into debt. Stimulated by the increasing interest in capital structure decisions of family businesses and by the growing demand for advocating a faster increase in the presence of female directors in boardrooms, our work addresses how family management and the presence of a female critical mass affect the firm indebtedness in a private firm context. This study uses a sample of 4223 private firms in Spain, a privileged context to test the objectives of this work, from 2006 to 2013. We find that family-managed firms rely more heavily on indebtedness than non-family managed firms. The results also suggest that the presence of female directors has a negative influence on indebtedness. Finally, our findings also show that the involvement of female directors moderates the family management-indebtedness relationship, in such that only when a critical mass of women directors is on the board, the positive effect of family management on firm indebtedness is diminished considerably. Practitioners should consider family management and female presence on the board as essential factors when establishing financing strategy. Likewise, government agencies should take into consideration both aspects when designing and setting policies.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 762
页数:35
相关论文
共 303 条
[1]  
Adams RB(2009)Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance J Financ Econ 94 291-309
[2]  
Ferreira D(2010)Moderation in groups: evidence from betting on ice break-ups in Alaska Rev Econ Stud 77 882-913
[3]  
Adams R(2003)Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan Am Econ Rev 93 193-215
[4]  
Ferreira D(1996)Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders J Financ Quant Anal 13 377-397
[5]  
Agnew J(2012)The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation Q J Econ 127 137-197
[6]  
Balduzzi P(2013)Capital structure decisions in family firms: empirical evidence from a bank-based economy Rev Manag Sci 7 247-275
[7]  
Sundén A(2003)Founding-family ownership and FP: evidence from the S&P 500 J Financ 58 1301-1328
[8]  
Agrawal A(2009)Founders, heirs, and corporate opacity in the United States J Financ Econ 92 205-222
[9]  
Knoeber R(2011)The economics of director heterogeneity Financ Manag 40 5-38
[10]  
Ahern K(2000)Agency costs and ownership structure J Financ 55 81-106