Toxicity of ZnO and TiO2 to Escherichia coli cells

被引:0
作者
Yu Hang Leung
Xiaoying Xu
Angel P. Y. Ma
Fangzhou Liu
Alan M. C. Ng
Zhiyong Shen
Lee A. Gethings
Mu Yao Guo
Aleksandra B. Djurišić
Patrick K. H. Lee
Hung Kay Lee
Wai Kin Chan
Frederick C. C. Leung
机构
[1] Dept. of Physics,Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences Division
[2] Univ. of Hong Kong,undefined
[3] School of Energy and Environment,undefined
[4] City University of Hong Kong,undefined
[5] School of Biological Sciences,undefined
[6] Univ. of Hong Kong,undefined
[7] Dept. of Physics,undefined
[8] South University of Science and Technology of China,undefined
[9] Waters Corporation,undefined
[10] Dept. of Chemistry,undefined
[11] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,undefined
[12] Shatin,undefined
[13] Dept. of Chemistry,undefined
[14] Univ. of Hong Kong,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 6卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We performed a comprehensive investigation of the toxicity of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles using Escherichia coli as a model organism. Both materials are wide band gap n-type semiconductors and they can interact with lipopolysaccharide molecules present in the outer membrane of E. coli, as well as produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) under UV illumination. Despite the similarities in their properties, the response of the bacteria to the two nanomaterials was fundamentally different. When the ROS generation is observed, the toxicity of nanomaterial is commonly attributed to oxidative stress and cell membrane damage caused by lipid peroxidation. However, we found that significant toxicity does not necessarily correlate with up-regulation of ROS-related proteins. TiO2 exhibited significant antibacterial activity, but the protein expression profile of bacteria exposed to TiO2 was different compared to H2O2 and the ROS-related proteins were not strongly expressed. On the other hand, ZnO exhibited lower antibacterial activity compared to TiO2, and the bacterial response involved up-regulating ROS-related proteins similar to the bacterial response to the exposure to H2O2. Reasons for the observed differences in toxicity and bacterial response to the two metal oxides are discussed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 233 条
[1]  
Huh AJ(2011)“Nanoantibiotics”: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era J. Controlled Release 156 128-145
[2]  
Kwon YJ(2014)Oxidative stress induced by inorganic nanoparticles in bacteria and aquatic microalgae–state of the art and knowledge gaps Nanotoxicology 8 605-630
[3]  
von Moos N(2011)Photocatalytic disinfection using titanium dioxide: spectrum and mechanism of antimicrobial activity Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 90 1847-1868
[4]  
Slaveykova VI(2010)Bacteria–nanoparticle interactions and their environmental implications Environ. Chem. 7 3-9
[5]  
Foster HA(2015)Toxicity screenings of nanomaterials: challenges due to interference with assay processes and components of classic Nanotoxicology 9 13-24
[6]  
Ditta IB(2015) tests Small 11 26-44
[7]  
Varghese S(2009)Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles: mechanisms, characterization, and avoiding experimental artefacts Energy Environ. Sci. 2 1231-1257
[8]  
Steele A(2014)Development of alternative photocatalysts to TiO PloS one 9 e110247-5573
[9]  
Aruguete DM(2013): challenges and opportunities Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97 5565-97
[10]  
Hochella MF(2015)Toxicity of TiO Aquatic Toxicol. 168 90-5253