Machine learning-based prediction of acute coronary syndrome using only the pre-hospital 12-lead electrocardiogram

被引:118
作者
Al-Zaiti S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Besomi L. [4 ]
Bouzid Z. [4 ]
Faramand Z. [1 ]
Frisch S. [1 ]
Martin-Gill C. [2 ,5 ]
Gregg R. [6 ]
Saba S. [3 ,5 ]
Callaway C. [2 ,5 ]
Sejdić E. [4 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Department of Acute & Tertiary Care Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
[3] Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
[4] Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
[5] University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA
[6] Advanced Algorithms Development Research Center, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA
[7] Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
[8] Department of Intelligent Systems, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41467-020-17804-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prompt identification of acute coronary syndrome is a challenge in clinical practice. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is readily available during initial patient evaluation, but current rule-based interpretation approaches lack sufficient accuracy. Here we report machine learning-based methods for the prediction of underlying acute myocardial ischemia in patients with chest pain. Using 554 temporal-spatial features of the 12-lead ECG, we train and test multiple classifiers on two independent prospective patient cohorts (n = 1244). While maintaining higher negative predictive value, our final fusion model achieves 52% gain in sensitivity compared to commercial interpretation software and 37% gain in sensitivity compared to experienced clinicians. Such an ultra-early, ECG-based clinical decision support tool, when combined with the judgment of trained emergency personnel, would help to improve clinical outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs in patients with chest pain. © 2020, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Benjamin E.J., Et al., Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association, Circulation, 137, pp. e67-e492, (2018)
[2]  
Falk E., Nakano M., Bentzon J.F., Finn A.V., Virmani R., Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists’ view, Eur. Heart J., 34, pp. 719-728, (2013)
[3]  
Kumar A., Cannon C.P., Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part I, Mayo Clin. Proc., 84, pp. 917-938, (2009)
[4]  
Lusis A.J., Atherosclerosis, Nature, 407, pp. 233-241, (2000)
[5]  
Nabel E.G., Braunwald E., A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction, N. Engl. J. Med., 366, pp. 54-63, (2012)
[6]  
Lukas A., Antzelevitch C., Differences in the electrophysiological response of canine ventricular epicardium and endocardium to ischemia. Role of the transient outward current, Circulation, 88, pp. 2903-2915, (1993)
[7]  
Al-Zaiti S.S., Callaway C.W., Kozik T.M., Carey M.G., Pelter M.M., Clinical utility of ventricular repolarization dispersion for real ‐ time detection of non ‐ ST elevation myocardial infarction in emergency departments, J. Am. Heart Assoc., 4, (2015)
[8]  
Al-Zaiti S., Et al., Evaluation of beat-to-beat ventricular repolarization lability from standard 12-Lead ECG during acute myocardial ischemia, J. Electrocardiol., 50, pp. 717-724, (2017)
[9]  
Al-Zaiti S., Et al., Spatial indices of repolarization correlate with non-ST elevation myocardial ischemia in patients with chest pain, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 56, pp. 1-12, (2018)
[10]  
Baxt W.G., Skora J., Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction, Lancet, 347, pp. 12-15, (1996)