Combining NIBS with EEG: What Can It Tell Us About Normal Cognition?

被引:0
作者
Taylor P.C.J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Neurology, LMU Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich
[2] German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, LMU Munich, Munich
关键词
Attention; Awareness; NIBS; Phosphene; TEP; TMS-EEG;
D O I
10.1007/s40473-018-0153-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: Given recent controversies about the limitations of using unnatural experimental contexts and overly reductionist approaches, it is timely to illustrate how combined TMS-EEG can inform the study of normal cognition. Recent Findings: The effect of TMS to visual cortices has been characterized with EEG, and related to specific aspects of normal perceptual cognition. Occipital regions act as one of multiple key trigger nodes in an attentional network that can function to some extent independently of awareness, and with a neural signature dissociable from that recorded after stimulating other nodes. Summary: The neural networks underlying cognition can be studied by comparing the neural and mental effects of stimulating different nodes. TMS pulses trigger a highly specific cascade of neural events and accompanying cognitive processes. This approach enables exploring how component processes aggregate together to give rise to perceptual cognition. The causal-mechanistic approach can provide evidence supporting particular psychological theories. © 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 169
页数:4
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V., Rothwell V., Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience—virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 10, pp. 232-237, (2000)
[2]  
Sack A.T., Transcranial magnetic stimulation, causal structure-function mapping and networks of functional relevance, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 16, 5, pp. 593-599, (2006)
[3]  
Krakauer J.W., Ghazanfar A.A., Gomez-Marin A., MacIver M.A., Poeppel D., Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias, Neuron, 93, 3, pp. 480-490, (2017)
[4]  
Parkin B.L., Ekhtiari H., Walsh V.F., Non-invasive human brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: a primer, Neuron, 87, 5, pp. 932-945, (2015)
[5]  
Huang Y.Z., Lu M.K., Antal A., Classen J., Nitsche M., Ziemann U., Ridding M., Hamada M., Ugawa Y., Jaberzadeh S., Suppa A., Paulus W., Rothwell J., Plasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: a position paper, Clin Neurophysiol, 128, 11, pp. 2318-2329, (2017)
[6]  
Bestmann S., Walsh V., Transcranial electrical stimulation, Curr Biol, 27, 23, pp. R1258-R1162, (2017)
[7]  
Herrmann C.S., Struber D., What can transcranial alternating current stimulation tell us about brain oscillations?, Curr Behav Neurosci Rep, 4, 2, pp. 128-137, (2017)
[8]  
Miniussi C., Thut G., Combining TMS and EEG offers new prospects in cognitive neuroscience, Brain Topogr, 22, 4, pp. 249-256, (2010)
[9]  
Thut G., Bergmann T.O., Frohlich F., Soekadar S.R., Brittain J.S., Valero-Cabre A., Et al., Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: a position paper, Clin Neurophysiol, 128, 5, pp. 843-857, (2017)
[10]  
Farzan F., Vernet M., Shafi M.M., Rotenberg A., Daskalakis Z.J., Pascual-Leone A., Characterizing and modulating brain circuitry through transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography, Front Neural Circuits, 10, (2016)