Size of lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: implication for imaging and oncologic follow-up of 2705 lymph-node positive patients

被引:6
|
作者
Falkenbach, Fabian [1 ]
Kachanov, Mykyta [2 ]
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi [3 ]
Maurer, Tobias [1 ,4 ]
Knipper, Sophie [1 ]
Koehler, Daniel [5 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
Sauter, Guido [6 ]
Budaeus, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Human Genet, Hamburg, Germany
[3] St Antonius Hosp, Prostate Ctr Northwest, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Uro Oncol, Gronau, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Pathol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Pelvic lymph node dissection; Micrometastases; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; PSMA; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-023-04724-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Despite modern imaging modalities, lymph-node staging before radical prostatectomy (RP) remains challenging in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). The visibility of lymph-node metastases (LNMs) is critically influenced by their size.Objective This study aims to describe the distribution of maximal tumor diameters (i.e., size) in LNMs of pN1-PCa at RP and its consequences on visibility in preoperative imaging and oncological outcomes.Design, setting, and participants A total of 2705 consecutive patients with pN1-PCa at RP, harboring a cumulative 7510 LNMs, were analyzed. Descriptive and multivariable analyses addressed the risk of micrometastases (MM)-only disease and the visibility of LNMs. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analyses were used for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) stratified for MM-only disease.Results The median LNM size was 4.5mm (interquartile range (IQR): 2.0-9.0 mm). Of 7510 LNMs, 1966 (26%) were MM (<= 2mm). On preoperative imaging, 526 patients (19%) showed suspicious findings (PSMA-PET/CT: 169/344, 49%). In multivariable analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (OR 0.98), age (OR 1.01), a Gleason score greater than 7 at biopsy (OR 0.73), percentage of positive cores at biopsy (OR 0.36), and neoadjuvant treatment (OR 0.51) emerged as independent predictors for less MM-only disease (p < 0.05). Patients with MM-only disease compared to those harboring larger LNMs had a longer BCRFS (median 60 versus 29 months, p < 0.0001).Conclusion Overall, 26% of LNMs were MM (<= 2mm). Adverse clinical parameters were inversely associated with MM at RP. Consequently, PSMA-PET/CT did not detect a substantial proportion of LNMs. LNM size and count are relevant for prognosis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical outcome of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy versus androgen deprivation
    Grimm, MO
    Kamphausen, S
    Hugenschmidt, H
    Stephan-Odenthal, M
    Ackermann, R
    Vögeli, TA
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 41 (06) : 628 - 634
  • [32] The rate and site of lymph node metastases during radical prostatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer
    Alekseev, B. Ya.
    Nyushko, K. M.
    Vorobyev, N. V.
    Kalpinskiy, A. S.
    Golorashehenko, M. P.
    Frank, G. A.
    Andreeva, Yu. Yu.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2012, 8 (01): : 77 - 81
  • [33] Comparison of external radiation therapy vs radical prostatectomy in lymph node positive prostate cancer patients
    Kuefer, R
    Volkmer, BG
    Loeffler, M
    Shen, RL
    Kempf, L
    Merseburger, AS
    Gschwend, JE
    Hautmann, RE
    Sandler, HM
    Rubin, MA
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2004, 7 (04) : 343 - 349
  • [34] Comparison of external radiation therapy vs radical prostatectomy in lymph node positive prostate cancer patients
    R Kuefer
    B G Volkmer
    M Loeffler
    R L Shen
    L Kempf
    A S Merseburger
    J E Gschwend
    R E Hautmann
    H M Sandler
    M A Rubin
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2004, 7 : 343 - 349
  • [35] Effect of Gleason scores of lymph node metastases on prognosis of patients with prostate cancer
    Ko, Kyungtae
    Jeong, In Gab
    Choi, Woo Suk
    Lim, Ju Hyun
    Suh, Ja Hee
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Park, Yangsoon
    Moon, Kyung Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Kwak, Cheol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (09): : 6141 - 6148
  • [36] Biochemical relapse predictive factors in patients with lymph node metastases during radical prostatectomy
    Mandoorah, Q.
    Benamran, D.
    Pinar, U.
    Seisen, T.
    Abdessater, M.
    Iselin, C.
    Roupret, M.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2022, 32 (16): : 1462 - 1468
  • [37] Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
    Kim Jr, Isaac E.
    Wang, Aaron H.
    Corpuz, George S.
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Brito, Joseph M.
    Renzulli, Joseph
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 12 (02) : 70 - 78
  • [38] Clinical outcomes of salvage treatment in lymph node-positive prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Kim, Dowook
    Kim, Dong-Yun
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [39] Extended pelvic lymph-node dissection and radiotherapy with curative intent in high-risk lymph-node-positive prostate cancer: a possible curative strategy?
    Al-Amiri, Bashar
    Lundin, Fredrik
    Walden, Mauritz
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [40] Prognostication in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer with No PSA Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Shiota, Masaki
    Takamatsu, Dai
    Matsui, Yoshiyuki
    Yokomizo, Akira
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Saito, Ryoichi
    Miyake, Makito
    Tsutsumi, Masakazu
    Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki
    Tashiro, Kojiro
    Tomida, Ryotaro
    Narita, Shintaro
    Edamura, Kohei
    Yamaguchi, Takahiro
    Hashimoto, Kohei
    Kato, Masashi
    Kasahara, Takashi
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Akamatsu, Shusuke
    Kaneko, Tomoyuki
    Matsukawa, Akihiro
    Matsumoto, Ryuji
    Joraku, Akira
    Saito, Toshihiro
    Kato, Takuma
    Kato, Manabu
    Enokida, Hideki
    Sakamoto, Shinichi
    Terada, Naoki
    Kanno, Hidenori
    Nishiyama, Naotaka
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Kitamura, Hiroshi
    Eto, Masatoshi
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 3872 - 3879