Size of lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: implication for imaging and oncologic follow-up of 2705 lymph-node positive patients

被引:6
|
作者
Falkenbach, Fabian [1 ]
Kachanov, Mykyta [2 ]
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi [3 ]
Maurer, Tobias [1 ,4 ]
Knipper, Sophie [1 ]
Koehler, Daniel [5 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
Sauter, Guido [6 ]
Budaeus, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Human Genet, Hamburg, Germany
[3] St Antonius Hosp, Prostate Ctr Northwest, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Uro Oncol, Gronau, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Pathol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Pelvic lymph node dissection; Micrometastases; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; PSMA; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-023-04724-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Despite modern imaging modalities, lymph-node staging before radical prostatectomy (RP) remains challenging in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). The visibility of lymph-node metastases (LNMs) is critically influenced by their size.Objective This study aims to describe the distribution of maximal tumor diameters (i.e., size) in LNMs of pN1-PCa at RP and its consequences on visibility in preoperative imaging and oncological outcomes.Design, setting, and participants A total of 2705 consecutive patients with pN1-PCa at RP, harboring a cumulative 7510 LNMs, were analyzed. Descriptive and multivariable analyses addressed the risk of micrometastases (MM)-only disease and the visibility of LNMs. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox analyses were used for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) stratified for MM-only disease.Results The median LNM size was 4.5mm (interquartile range (IQR): 2.0-9.0 mm). Of 7510 LNMs, 1966 (26%) were MM (<= 2mm). On preoperative imaging, 526 patients (19%) showed suspicious findings (PSMA-PET/CT: 169/344, 49%). In multivariable analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (OR 0.98), age (OR 1.01), a Gleason score greater than 7 at biopsy (OR 0.73), percentage of positive cores at biopsy (OR 0.36), and neoadjuvant treatment (OR 0.51) emerged as independent predictors for less MM-only disease (p < 0.05). Patients with MM-only disease compared to those harboring larger LNMs had a longer BCRFS (median 60 versus 29 months, p < 0.0001).Conclusion Overall, 26% of LNMs were MM (<= 2mm). Adverse clinical parameters were inversely associated with MM at RP. Consequently, PSMA-PET/CT did not detect a substantial proportion of LNMs. LNM size and count are relevant for prognosis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radical prostatectomy in lymph-node positive disease?
    Kalies, R
    Leitenberger, A
    Schneider, W
    Altwein, JE
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 1997, 28 (06) : 316 - 322
  • [2] The Impact of the Extent of Lymph-node Dissection on Biochemical Relapse after Radical Prostatectomy in Node-negative Patients
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Bertaccini, Alessandro
    Franceschelli, Alessandro
    Manferrari, Fabio
    Vagnoni, Valerio
    Borghesi, Marco
    Morselli-Labate, Antonio M.
    Martorana, Giuseppe
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (06) : 2297 - 2302
  • [3] Can contralateral lymph-node metastases be ruled out in prostate cancer patients with only unilaterally positive prostate biopsy?
    Michalik, Bianca
    Engels, Svenja
    Kampmeier, Leonie
    Dirks, Lena
    Henke, R. -Peter
    Wawroschek, Friedhelm
    Winter, Alexander
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 28 (12) : 1659 - 1666
  • [4] Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Lymph-node Positive Prostate Cancer
    von Eyben, Finn E.
    Kairemo, Kalevi
    Kiljunen, Timo
    Joensuu, Timo
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (03) : 353 - 355
  • [5] KLK3 and TMPRSS2 for molecular lymph-node staging in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy
    Lunger, Lukas
    Retz, Margitta
    Bandur, Miriam
    Souchay, Marc
    Vitzthum, Elisabeth
    Jaeger, Marion
    Weirich, Gregor
    Schuster, Tibor
    Autenrieth, Michael
    Kuebler, Hubert
    Maurer, Tobias
    Thalgott, Mark
    Herkommer, Kathleen
    Koll, Florestan
    Gschwend, Juergen E.
    Nawroth, Roman
    Heck, Matthias M.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2021, 24 (02) : 362 - 369
  • [6] Mid-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy in lymph node metastatic prostate cancer patients
    Berchiche, W.
    Depaquit, T. Long
    Baboudjian, M.
    Barret, E.
    Rozet, F.
    Cathelineau, X.
    Bastide, C.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2023, 33 (8-9): : 437 - 445
  • [7] Survival Benefit of Radical Prostatectomy in Lymph Node-Positive Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Engel, Jutta
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    Baur, Helmut
    Beer, Volker
    Chaussy, Christian
    Gschwend, Juergen E.
    Oberneder, Ralph
    Rothenberger, Karl H.
    Stief, Christian G.
    Hoelzel, Dieter
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (05) : 754 - 761
  • [8] Can contralateral lymph-node metastases be ruled out in prostate cancer patients with only unilaterally positive prostate biopsy?
    Bianca Michalik
    Svenja Engels
    Leonie Kampmeier
    Lena Dirks
    R.-Peter Henke
    Friedhelm Wawroschek
    Alexander Winter
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 28 : 1659 - 1666
  • [9] DILEMMA OF MICROSCOPIC LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN HUMAN PROSTATE-CANCER
    EKMAN, P
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1993, 24 : 57 - 60
  • [10] Decreasing Rate and Extent of Lymph Node Staging in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy May Undermine the Rate of Diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer
    Abdollah, Firas
    Sun, Maxine
    Thuret, Rodolphe
    Budaeus, Lars
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Graefen, Markus
    Briganti, Alberto
    Perrotte, Paul
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (06) : 882 - 892