Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial

被引：0
作者：
Sebiha Özkan
Eray Çalışkan
Emek Doğer
İzzet Yücesoy
Semih Özeren
Birol Vural
机构：
[1] Kocaeli University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
来源：
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2009年 / 280卷
关键词：
Misoprostol; Dinoprostone; Labor induction;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：19 / 24
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study [J].
Bolla, Daniele ;
Weissleder, Saskia Vanessa ;
Radan, Anda-Petronela ;
Gasparri, Maria Luisa ;
Raio, Luigi ;
Mueller, Martin ;
Surbek, Daniel .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
[32]   Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction [J].
Agarwal, N ;
Gupta, A ;
Kriplani, A ;
Bhatla, N ;
Parul .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (03) :147-151
[33]   A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Marsdal, Kjersti Engen ;
Sorbye, Ingvil Krarup ;
Gaudernack, Lise C. ;
Lukasse, Mirjam .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18 :11
[34]   Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies [J].
de Moraes Filho, Olimpio Barbosa ;
de Albuquerque, Rivaldo Mendes ;
Correia Pacheco, Alvaro Jose ;
Ribeiro, Renata Holanda ;
Cecatti, Jose Guilherme ;
Welkovic, Stefan .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2005, 27 (01) :24-31
[35]   Effect of acidic vaginal pH on the efficacy of dinoprostone (PGE2) vaginal tablet for labor induction in full term pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Panagiotopoulos, Michail ;
Pergialiotis, Vasilios ;
Antsaklis, Panagiotis ;
Theodora, Marianna ;
Sindos, Michail ;
Daskalaki, Maria-Anastasia ;
Koutroumanis, Pelopidas ;
Daskalakis, George .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (07) :730-736
[36]   Comparison of perinatal outcomes using oral misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol, and intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor [J].
Szekeresova, P. ;
Hruban, L. ;
Jouzova, A. ;
Janku, P. ;
Gerychova, R. ;
Huptych, M. .
CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2025, 90 (02) :105-112
[37]   Transcervical foley catheter or vaginal misoprostol for induction of term pregnancy labor: a randomized trial [J].
Rosado-Tovar, Maria ;
Reyna-Villasmil, Eduardo ;
Santos-Bolivar, Joel ;
Mejia-Montilla, Jorly ;
Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia ;
Fernandez-Ramirez, Andreina .
AVANCES EN BIOMEDICINA, 2016, 5 (03) :129-137
[38]   Efficacy and safety of misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a meta-analysis [J].
Wang, Lina ;
Zheng, Jianlan ;
Wang, Wenyan ;
Fu, Jingli ;
Hou, Li .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (08) :1297-1307
[39]   Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Paungmora, N ;
Herabutya, Y ;
O-Prasertsawat, P ;
Punyavachira, P .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2004, 30 (05) :358-362
[40]   A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction [J].
Moraes Filho, Olimpio B. ;
Albuquerque, Rivaldo M. ;
Cecatti, Jose G. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (08) :1045-1052
12345