Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial

被引：0
作者：
Sebiha Özkan
Eray Çalışkan
Emek Doğer
İzzet Yücesoy
Semih Özeren
Birol Vural
机构：
[1] Kocaeli University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
来源：
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2009年 / 280卷
关键词：
Misoprostol; Dinoprostone; Labor induction;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：19 / 24
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
    Bhatia, Anju
    Teo, Puay Ling
    Li, Mingyue
    Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice
    Chan, Mei Xin Joanne
    Yeo, Tai Wai
    Mathur, Manisha
    Tagore, Shephali
    Yeo, George S. H.
    Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (09) : 3171 - 3178
  • [22] Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
    Xiu Wang
    Aijun Yang
    Qingyong Ma
    Xuelan Li
    Li Qin
    Tongqiang He
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 294 : 495 - 503
  • [23] Misoprostol vaginal insert (Mysodelle) versus Dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin) for induction of labour
    Sharp, A.
    Faluyi, D.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 41 - 44
  • [24] Mode of delivery after labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone versus oral misoprostol for women with unfavorable cervix at term
    Jolivet, Solene
    Delavallade, Melanie
    Giraud, Antoine
    Chauleur, Celine
    Raia-Barjat, Tiphaine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 285 : 7 - 11
  • [25] Comparison of Misoprostol for Labor Induction: Vaginal Insert Versus Oral Application Concerning Efficiency and Safety
    Ratiu, Dominik
    Hunke, Mirka
    Ratiu, Jessika
    Mallmann-Gottschalk, Nina
    Mallmann, Peter
    Baek, Sunhwa
    Gruettner, Berthold
    Hide-Moser, Katherina
    IN VIVO, 2024, 38 (05): : 2349 - 2357
  • [26] Is Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol Better Than Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Madaan, Monika
    Agrawal, Swati
    Puri, Manju
    Nigam, Aruna
    Kaur, Harvinder
    Trivedi, Shubha Sagar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (09) : OC31 - OC34
  • [27] Induction of labor with repeated prostaglandin administration after failure of dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study comparing dinoprostone and misoprostol
    Mancarella, Matteo
    Torro, Diego Costa
    Moggio, Giulia
    Bounous, Valentina E.
    Biglia, Nicoletta
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, : 19 - 26
  • [28] Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial
    Samanta, Ajanta
    Rakshit, Bibek Mohan
    Mistri, Pallab Kumar
    Chakraborty, Arup
    Bag, Tarasankar
    Das, Piyali
    Pande, Arindam
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (09) : 2267 - 2272
  • [29] Vaginal dinoprostone insert compared with two different oral misoprostol regimens for labor induction in nulliparous and multiparous women
    Erhardt, Damaris
    Radan, Anda
    Mathis, Jerome
    Surbek, Daniel
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 103 (11) : 2306 - 2313
  • [30] Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor
    Rouzi, Abdulrahim A.
    Alsibiani, Sharifa
    Mansouri, Nisma
    Alsinani, Nawal
    Darhouse, Khalid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01)
12345