Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial

被引：0
作者：
Sebiha Özkan
Eray Çalışkan
Emek Doğer
İzzet Yücesoy
Semih Özeren
Birol Vural
机构：
[1] Kocaeli University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
来源：
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2009年 / 280卷
关键词：
Misoprostol; Dinoprostone; Labor induction;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：19 / 24
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial
    Ozkan, Sebiha
    Caliskan, Eray
    Doger, Emek
    Yucesoy, Izzet
    Ozeren, Semih
    Vural, Birol
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 280 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [2] Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert
    Maggi, Claudia
    Mazzoni, Giorgia
    Gerosa, Vera
    Fratelli, Nicola
    Prefumo, Federico
    Sartori, Enrico
    Lojacono, Andrea
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (10) : 1268 - 1273
  • [3] Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert - A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
    Beyer, Jana
    Jaeger, Yvonne
    Balci, Derya
    Kolb, Gelia
    Weschenfelder, Friederike
    Seeger, Sven
    Schlembach, Dietmar
    Abou-Dakn, Michael
    Schleussner, Ekkehard
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2022, 82 (08) : 868 - 873
  • [4] Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction:: A randomized controlled trial
    Dällenbach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [5] Oral Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Tablets for Labor Induction
    Abu El Aish, Khaled Ibrahim
    Zourob, Haly Suliman
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (03): : 382 - 389
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: A randomized controlled trial
    Denguezli W.
    Trimech A.
    Haddad A.
    Hajjaji A.
    Saidani Z.
    Faleh R.
    Sakouhi M.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2007, 276 (2) : 119 - 124
  • [7] Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial
    De Bonrostro Torralba, Carlos
    Tejero Cabrejas, Eva Lucia
    Envid Lazaro, Blanca Mar
    Franco Royo, Maria Jesus
    Roca Arquillue, Montserrat
    Campillos Maza, Jose Manuel
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (07) : 913 - 919
  • [8] Randomized trial of concurrent oxytocin with a sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction at term
    Christensen, FC
    Tehranifar, M
    Gonzalez, JL
    Qualls, CR
    Rappaport, VJ
    Rayburn, WF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [9] Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes
    Rankin, Katharine
    Chodankar, Rohan
    Raymond, Kyle
    Bhaskar, Swetha
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 235 : 93 - 96
  • [10] Safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor: A single-center randomized control trial
    Wang, Xiu
    Zhang, Chao
    Li, Xia
    Qi, Hongyan
    Liu, Qing
    Lei, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 154 (03) : 436 - 443
12345