Longitudinal Service Learning in Medical Education: An Ethical Analysis of the Five-Year Alternative Curriculum at Stritch School of Medicine

被引:4
作者
Borah B.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Internal Medicine Resident, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1108 N. Damen Ave. Apt #2F, Chicago, 60622, IL
关键词
Advocacy; Global health; IHE; Professionalism; Service learning; Social medicine;
D O I
10.1007/s10912-018-9529-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article, the author explores a model of alternative medical education being pioneered at Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. The five-year Global Health Fieldwork Fellowship (GHFF) track allows two students per year to complete an extra year of medical education while living and working in a free rural clinic in the jungle lowlands of Bolivia. This alternative curricular track is unique among other existing models in that it is (a) longitudinally immersive for at least one full additional year of medical education, (b) grounded in clinical and service learning, and (c) heavily focused upon global health and the social components of medicine. Studies have shown that both longitudinal alternative medical curricular tracks and short-term global health electives have long-term benefits upon the professional development of participants, suggesting that the GHFF is likely to do the same. The author also argues that the GHFF is an advantageous model of global health education compared to standard offerings and provides a unique curricular model by which to foster the development of social values—such as professionalism, advocacy, and social justice—that are widely considered lacking in today’s medical education. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 416
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Accelerating Change in Medical Education: Creating the Medical School of the Future, (2015)
  • [2] Aulakh A., Tweed S., Moore J., Graham W., Integrating Global Health with Medical Education, The Clinical Teacher, 13, pp. 1-5, (2016)
  • [3] Belling C., Sharper Instruments: On Defending the Humanities in Undergraduate Medical Education, Academic Medicine, 85, 6, pp. 938-940, (2010)
  • [4] Bleakley A., The curriculum is dead! Long live the curriculum! Designing an Undergraduate Medicine and Surgery Curriculum for the Future, Medical Teacher, 34, pp. 543-547, (2012)
  • [5] Bruno D.M., Imperato P.J., A Global Health Elective for US Medical Students: The 35 Year Experience of the State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, School of Public Health, Journal of Community Health, 40, pp. 187-198, (2015)
  • [6] Charon R., Calculating the Contributions of Humanities to Medical Practice—Motives, Methods, and Metrics, Academic Medicine, 85, 6, pp. 935-937, (2010)
  • [7] Cooke M., Irby D.M., Sullivan W., Ludmerer K.M., American Medical Education 100 years after the Flexner Report, NEJM, 355, pp. 1339-1344, (2006)
  • [8] Doukas D.J., Kirch D.G., Brigham T.P., Barzansky B.M., Et al., Transforming Educational Accountability in Medical Ethics and Humanities Education toward Professionalism, Academic Medicine, 90, 6, pp. 738-743, (2015)
  • [9] Edwards R., Piachaud J., Rowson M., Miranda J., Understanding Global Health Issues: Are International Medical Electives the Answer?, Medical Education, 38, pp. 688-690, (2004)
  • [10] Farmer P., Gutierrez G., In the Company of the Poor: Conversations with Dr. Paul Farmer and Fr. Gustavo Gutiérrez, (2013)