Cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, irreversible electroporation, and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Run-Qi Guo
Xiao-Xiao Guo
Yuan-Ming Li
Zhi-Xin Bie
Bin Li
Xiao-Guang Li
机构
[1] Beijing Hospital,Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center
[2] National Center of Gerontology,Institute of Geriatric Medicine
[3] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Department of Urology
[4] Beijing Hospital,undefined
[5] National Center of Gerontology,undefined
[6] Peking Union Medical College,undefined
[7] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,undefined
来源
International Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2021年 / 26卷
关键词
Cryoablation; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Irreversible electroporation; Prostate cancer; Vascular-targeted phototherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cryoablation (CA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), irreversible electroporation (IRE), and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) have been evaluated as novel strategies for selected patients with prostate cancer (PCa). We aim to determine the current status of literature regarding the clinical outcomes among these minimally invasive therapies. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all English literature published from January 2001 to December 2019 was conducted to identify studies evaluating outcomes of CA, HIFU, IRE or VTP on PCa. Proportionality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using STATA version 14.0. 56 studies consisting of 7383 participants were found to report data of interest and fulfilled the inclusion criteria in the final meta-analysis. The pooled proportions of positive biopsy after procedure were 20.0%, 24.3%, 24.2%, and 36.2% in CA, HIFU, IRE and VTP, respectively. The pooled proportions of BRFS were 75.7% for CA and 74.4% for HIFU. The pooled proportions of CSS were 96.1%, 98.2%, and 97.9% for CA, HIFU, and IRE, respectively. The pooled proportions of OS were 92.8% for CA and 85.2% for HIFU. The pooled proportions of FFS were 64.7%, 90.4%, and 76.7% for CA, IRE and VTP, respectively. The pooled proportions of MFS were 92.8% for HIFU and 99.1% for IRE. This meta-analysis shows that CA, HIFU, IRE, and VTP are promising therapies for PCa patients with similar clinical outcomes. However, further larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this assertion.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 484
页数:23
相关论文
共 219 条
  • [31] Chinenov DV(2006)Focal prostate cryoablation: initial results show cancer control and potency preservation J Endourol 20 688-1130
  • [32] Rapoport LM(2003)Treatment of organ confined prostate cancer with third generation cryosurgery: preliminary multicenter experience J Urol 170 1126-138
  • [33] Shpot EV(2002)Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: 5 year follow-up of a prospective study Eur Urol 42 133-487
  • [34] Chen CH(2001)Cryosurgical ablation for prostate cancer: preliminary results of a new advanced technique Isr Med Assoc J 3 484-724
  • [35] Pu YS(2019)Extensive histological sampling following focal therapy of clinically significant prostate cancer with high intensity focused ultrasound J Urol 202 717-989
  • [36] Elshafei A(2018)Prospective multicenter phase II study on focal therapy (hemiablation) of the prostate with high intensity focused ultrasound J Urol 199 983-273
  • [37] Tay KJ(2017)Focal high intensity focused ultrasound of unilateral localized prostate cancer: a prospective multicentric hemiablation study of 111 patients Eur Urol 71 267-628
  • [38] Kara O(2017)Focal therapy for prostate cancer with In-Bore MR-guided focused ultrasound: two-year follow-up of a phase I trial-complications and functional outcomes Radiology 285 620-455
  • [39] Kongnyuy M(2016)Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate tissue in patients with localized prostate cancer: a prospective phase 1 clinical trial Eur Urol 70 447-220
  • [40] Lipsky MJ(2016)Focal high-intensity focused ultrasound targeted hemiablation for unilateral prostate cancer: a prospective evaluation of oncologic and functional outcomes Eur Urol 69 214-83