Cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, irreversible electroporation, and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Run-Qi Guo
Xiao-Xiao Guo
Yuan-Ming Li
Zhi-Xin Bie
Bin Li
Xiao-Guang Li
机构
[1] Beijing Hospital,Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center
[2] National Center of Gerontology,Institute of Geriatric Medicine
[3] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Department of Urology
[4] Beijing Hospital,undefined
[5] National Center of Gerontology,undefined
[6] Peking Union Medical College,undefined
[7] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,undefined
来源
International Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2021年 / 26卷
关键词
Cryoablation; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Irreversible electroporation; Prostate cancer; Vascular-targeted phototherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cryoablation (CA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), irreversible electroporation (IRE), and vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) have been evaluated as novel strategies for selected patients with prostate cancer (PCa). We aim to determine the current status of literature regarding the clinical outcomes among these minimally invasive therapies. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all English literature published from January 2001 to December 2019 was conducted to identify studies evaluating outcomes of CA, HIFU, IRE or VTP on PCa. Proportionality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using STATA version 14.0. 56 studies consisting of 7383 participants were found to report data of interest and fulfilled the inclusion criteria in the final meta-analysis. The pooled proportions of positive biopsy after procedure were 20.0%, 24.3%, 24.2%, and 36.2% in CA, HIFU, IRE and VTP, respectively. The pooled proportions of BRFS were 75.7% for CA and 74.4% for HIFU. The pooled proportions of CSS were 96.1%, 98.2%, and 97.9% for CA, HIFU, and IRE, respectively. The pooled proportions of OS were 92.8% for CA and 85.2% for HIFU. The pooled proportions of FFS were 64.7%, 90.4%, and 76.7% for CA, IRE and VTP, respectively. The pooled proportions of MFS were 92.8% for HIFU and 99.1% for IRE. This meta-analysis shows that CA, HIFU, IRE, and VTP are promising therapies for PCa patients with similar clinical outcomes. However, further larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this assertion.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 484
页数:23
相关论文
共 219 条
  • [1] Valerio M(2014)The role of focal therapy in the management of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review Eur Urol 66 732-751
  • [2] Ahmed HU(2017)New and established technology in focal ablation of the prostate: a systematic review Eur Urol 71 17-34
  • [3] Emberton M(1964)Experimental prostate cryosurgery Invest Urol 1 610-619
  • [4] Valerio M(2016)High intensity focused ultrasound for focal therapy of prostate cancer Arch Esp Urol 69 311-316
  • [5] Cerantola Y(2005)Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation Ann Biomed Eng 33 223-231
  • [6] Eggener SE(2011)Acute and subacute effects of irreversible electroporation on nerves: experimental study in a pig model Radiology 260 421-427
  • [7] Gonder MJ(2003)Selectivity of the photosensitiser Tookad for photodynamic therapy evaluated in the Syrian golden hamster cheek pouch tumour model Br J Cancer 89 2320-2326
  • [8] Soanes WA(2003)Photodynamic therapy with Pd-Bacteriopheophorbide (TOOKAD): successful in vivo treatment of human prostatic small cell carcinoma xenografts Int J Cancer 104 782-789
  • [9] Smith V(2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Ann Intern Med 151 264-269
  • [10] Sivaraman A(2000)Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group JAMA 283 2008-2012