The relationships between perceived teacher autonomy support, academic self-efficacy and learning engagement among primary school students: A network analysis

被引:0
作者
Zixu Hu
Na Shan
Runkai Jiao
机构
[1] Northeast Normal University,School of Psychology
[2] Northeast Normal University,Key Laboratory of Applied Statistics of the Ministry of Education
[3] Northeast Normal University,National Training Center for Kindergarten Principals of the Ministry of Education
来源
European Journal of Psychology of Education | 2024年 / 39卷
关键词
Perceived teacher autonomy support; Academic self-efficacy; Learning engagement; Network analysis; Conditional independence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Learning engagement is malleable to environmental change. An important learning environment created by teacher-student interactions is perceived teacher autonomy support, which may trigger learning engagement directly and/or indirectly by enhancing academic self-efficacy. In this study, we apply a network approach to explore the relationships between the specific facets of perceived teacher autonomy support, academic self-efficacy and learning engagement, and a sample consisting of 215 students in the fifth and sixth grades from a primary school in Changchun of China is used. Node centrality indicators and the accuracy and stability of the network are also calculated. The results reveal that there are no edges between the three facets of perceived teacher autonomy support and the three facets of learning engagement, and the shortest path connecting the two constructs is through academic ability self-efficacy. Furthermore, learning support, academic ability self-efficacy, and dedication have the top three strengths in the network, which indicates that the three facets are more closely related to other facets of the network.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 516
页数:13
相关论文
共 150 条
[1]  
Ahlfeldt S(2005)Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use Higher Education Research and Development 24 5-20
[2]  
Mehta S(1990)Measuring and changing teachers’ differential behavior as perceived by students and teachers Journal of Educational Psychology 82 683-690
[3]  
Sellnow T(1999)Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2 21-41
[4]  
Babad E(2008)Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems Journal of Clinical Psychology 64 1089-1108
[5]  
Bandura A(2019)What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 128 892-903
[6]  
Borsboom D(2000)Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings Social Development 9 115-125
[7]  
Bringmann LF(2021)Workplace and classroom incivility and learning engagement: The moderating role of locus of control International Journal for Educational Integrity 17 1-17
[8]  
Elmer T(2015)Gaozhongsheng xuexi dongji, ziwo xiaonenggan ji xuesheng ganzhi de jiaoshi zhichi yu yingyu chengji de guanxi yanjiu [A study on the influencing factors of english academic performance in high school students] Journal of Longdong University 26 107-109
[9]  
Epskamp S(2012)Handbook of research on student engagement Springer 33 137-193
[10]  
Krause RW(2010)Comorbidity: A network perspective The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 136 68-78