Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy

被引:0
作者
Christian Anton
Juliette Young
Paula A. Harrison
Martin Musche
Györgyi Bela
Christian K. Feld
Richard Harrington
John R. Haslett
György Pataki
Mark D. A. Rounsevell
Michalis Skourtos
J. Paulo Sousa
Martin T. Sykes
Rob Tinch
Marie Vandewalle
Allan Watt
Josef Settele
机构
[1] Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ,Department of Community Ecology
[2] Centre for Ecology and Hydrology,Environmental Change Institute
[3] Oxford University Centre for the Environment,Department of Applied Zoology/Hydrobiology
[4] University of Duisburg-Essen,Department of Plant and Invertebrate Ecology
[5] Rothamsted Research,Department of Organismal Biology
[6] University of Salzburg,Environmental Social Science Research Group
[7] Szent István University,Centre for the study of Environmental Change and Sustainability (CECS), School of Geosciences
[8] University of Edinburgh,Department of Environment
[9] University of Aegean,IMAR
[10] University of Coimbra,CMA, Department of Life Sciences
[11] Lund University,Department of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
[12] Median SCP,undefined
[13] Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina,undefined
来源
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2010年 / 19卷
关键词
Biodiversity; Conservation policy; Ecosystem services; Indicators; Knowledge base; Research priorities; Valuation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using a range of different methods including extensive reviews, workshops and an electronic conference, 70 key research recommendations and 12 priority research needs to integrate the ecosystem services approach into biodiversity conservation policy and funding were identified by a cross-disciplinary group of over 100 scientists and 50 stakeholders, including research funders and policy-makers. These recommendations focus on the ecological underpinning of ecosystem services, drivers that affect ecosystems and their services, biological traits and ecosystem services, the valuation of ecosystem services, spatial and temporal scales in ecosystem service assessment, indicators of ecosystem services, and habitat management, conservation policy and ecosystem services. The recommendations in this paper help steer the research agenda on ecosystem services into policy-relevant areas, agreed upon by funders, researchers and policy-makers. This research agenda will only succeed with increased collaboration between researchers across disciplines, thereby providing a challenge to the research community and research funders to work in new, interdisciplinary ways.
引用
收藏
页码:2979 / 2994
页数:15
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Balmford A(2005)Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being Ecol Lett 8 1218-1234
[2]  
Bond W(2002)Economic reasons for conserving wild nature Science 297 950-953
[3]  
Balmford A(2003)Measuring the changing state of nature Trends Ecol Evol 18 326-330
[4]  
Bruner A(2006)Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services Ecol Lett 9 1146-1156
[5]  
Cooper P(2007)Climate change and biodiversity: impacts and policy development challenges—a European case study Int J Biodiv Sci Manag 3 12-30
[6]  
Balmford A(2006)Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Research needs Science 314 257-258
[7]  
Green RE(2009)Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment PNAS 106 1305-1312
[8]  
Jenkins M(2006)Conservation planning for ecosystem services PLOS Biol 4 e379-e379
[9]  
Balvanera P(1997)The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 387 253-260
[10]  
Pfisterer AB(2000)Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services Environ Sci Policy 3 333-339