One-way carsharing’s evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas

被引:0
作者
Susan A. Shaheen
Nelson D. Chan
Helen Micheaux
机构
[1] University of California,Transportation Sustainability Research Center
[2] Berkeley,Transportation Sustainability Research Center
[3] University of California,undefined
[4] Berkeley,undefined
[5] Mines Paristech,undefined
来源
Transportation | 2015年 / 42卷
关键词
Roundtrip carsharing; One-way carsharing; Free-floating; Station-based; Survey;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Roundtrip carsharing has been documented as a strategy to reduce car ownership and vehicle miles/kilometers traveled in urban areas. The expansion of carsharing and other forms of shared-use mobility have led to a growing interest in understanding the latest models. In recent years, one-way carsharing has gained momentum across the globe with 18 operators providing services in ten countries worldwide. One-way carsharing does not require its users to return the vehicle to the same location from which it was accessed (in contrast to roundtrip carsharing). Users typically pay by the minute versus the hour and do not require a reservation. There are two one-way models: free-floating and station-based. Free-floating carsharing allows vehicles to be picked up and left anywhere within a designated operating area, while station-based requires users to return vehicles to an available station. In Fall 2013, the authors conducted a survey of 26 roundtrip and five one-way carsharing operators in the Americas (U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil) to understand their perspectives on one-way carsharing and its future. Almost 70 % of roundtrip operators viewed one-way carsharing as a complement to roundtrip carsharing, while 19 % viewed it as a competitor. Twelve percent perceived it as both a complement and competitor. Operators noted public transit, smartcard, and electric vehicle integration as key to this model’s expansion. Half of respondents believed one-way and roundtrip carsharing have similar social and environmental impacts. Given limited understanding of its impacts, more research is needed to document the benefits of one-way carsharing and to help inform policymaking and urban mobility.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 536
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Barth M(2007)Carsharing and station cars in Asia: an overview of Japan and Singapore Transp. Res. Rec. 1986 106-115
  • [2] Shaheen S(2000)Intelligent transportation system technology in a shared electric vehicle program Transp. Res. Rec. 1731 88-95
  • [3] Fukuda T(2012)A new shared vehicle system for urban areas Transp. Res. C-Emer. 21 230-243
  • [4] Fukuda A(2012)Ridesharing in North America: past, present, and future Transp. Rev. 32 93-112
  • [5] Barth M(2012)Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems Trans. Res. E-Log 48 233-247
  • [6] Todd M(2012)Synopsis of users’ behaviour of a carsharing program: a case study in Toronto Transp. Res. A 46 421-434
  • [7] Murakami H(2012)One-way carsharing: solving the relocation problem Transp. Res. Rec. 2319 113-120
  • [8] Cepolina EM(2008)Carsharing: dynamic decision-makingproblem for vehicle allocation Transp. Res. Rec. 2063 97-104
  • [9] Farina A(2012)Evaluation of carsharing network’s growth strategies through discrete event simulation Expert Syst. Appl. 39 6692-6705
  • [10] Chan N(2012)Triangulation of two methods measuring the impacts of a free-floating carsharing system in Germany Transp. Res. A-Pol. 46 1654-1672