"virtual Inquiry": Teaching Molecular Aspects of Evolutionary Biology Through Computer-Based Inquiry

被引:0
|
作者
Toth E.E. [1 ]
Brem S.K. [2 ]
Erdos G. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Human Resources and Education, West Virginia University, 604H Allen Hall, P.O. Box 6122, Morgantown, 26506-6122, WV
[2] Psychology in Education, School of Education, Arizona State University, University Drive and Mill Avenue, Tempe, AZ
[3] Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Lathrop Hall, 190 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, 15213, PA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Genetic diversity; Inquiry learning; Learning and instruction; Virtual laboratories;
D O I
10.1007/s12052-009-0163-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Genetic diversity is a core concept in evolutionary biology; genetic variation is a prerequisite for heritable differential selection, and biodiversity plays a central role in debates about environmental policy today. The technique of gel electrophoresis provides a simple, visual demonstration of the variation that exists on the genetic level among individuals of a species. "DNA fingerprinting", in particular, is a method that exploits variation within species and has been explored extensively by the news media and popular television shows. In this paper, we suggest that science educators can capitalize on this momentum of interest and incorporate gel electrophoresis to their teaching as a starting point for the examination of genetic diversity that connects fundamental concepts of the molecular, cellular, organismic, and population levels of ecological organization. As a pedagogical tool toward this aim, we examine how increasingly complex inquiry learning can be supported in classrooms by the application of software tools called "virtual laboratories". The paper is a synthesis of current research on the integration of software design and instructional design to illustrate how two software tools can be employed for different levels of inquiry learning. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 687
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Does inquiry-based learning work better in regular classrooms or computer-based settings?
    Kapici, Hasan Ozgur
    INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2025,
  • [2] Design of virtual experiment platform based on inquiry
    Zhang Jin
    Shen Hong
    Advanced Computer Technology, New Education, Proceedings, 2007, : 1202 - 1205
  • [3] An Inquiry Teaching Mode Based on STEM Education
    Zhai, Lian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2019, 14 (17): : 44 - 58
  • [4] Does Group Size Affect Students' Inquiry and Collaboration in Using Computer-Based Asymmetric Collaborative Simulations?
    Rannastu, Meeli
    Siiman, Leo Aleksander
    Maeots, Mario
    Pedaste, Margus
    Leijen, Ali
    ADVANCES IN WEB-BASED LEARNING - ICWL 2019, 2019, 11841 : 143 - 154
  • [5] Transforming undergraduate biology learning with inquiry-based instruction
    Jennifer Kreps Frisch
    Paula C. Jackson
    Meg C. Murray
    Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2018, 30 : 211 - 236
  • [6] Transforming undergraduate biology learning with inquiry-based instruction
    Frisch, Jennifer Kreps
    Jackson, Paula C.
    Murray, Meg C.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 30 (02) : 211 - 236
  • [7] The experiment editor: supporting inquiry based learning with virtual labs
    Galan, D.
    Heradio, R.
    de la Torre, L.
    Dormido, S.
    Esquembre, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2017, 38 (03)
  • [8] Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning and Computer Modeling: Pitfalls and Potentials
    Mulder, Yvonne G.
    Lazonder, Ard W.
    de Jong, Ton
    SIMULATION & GAMING, 2015, 46 (3-4) : 322 - 347
  • [9] Enhancing the Student Experiment Experience: Visible Scientific Inquiry Through a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory
    Donnelly, Dermot
    O'Reilly, John
    McGarr, Oliver
    RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2013, 43 (04) : 1571 - 1592
  • [10] Enhancing the Student Experiment Experience: Visible Scientific Inquiry Through a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory
    Dermot Donnelly
    John O’Reilly
    Oliver McGarr
    Research in Science Education, 2013, 43 : 1571 - 1592