Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)

被引:0
|
作者
Azime Esen
Hatice Sari
Fedai Erler
Alper Adak
Duygu Sari
Tuba Eker
Huseyin Canci
Cengiz İkten
Abdullah Kahraman
Cengiz Toker
机构
[1] Akdeniz University,Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture
[2] Akdeniz University,Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture
[3] Harran University,Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture
来源
Euphytica | 2019年 / 215卷
关键词
Pulse beetle;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of resistant plant varieties is an important control option in the management of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) under storage conditions. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to screen and select pea (Pisum L.) accessions for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) under storage conditions. Seeds of four Pisum taxa including two accessions each of P. sativum L. (ACP 11, ACP 15), P. elatius M. Bieb. (AWP 442, AWP 449), P. fulvum Sibth. & Sm. (AWP 600, AWP 601) and one accession of P. abyssinicum A. Braun. (ACP 100) were evaluated using both free-choice and no-choice test methods for the pest under laboratory conditions. Resistance was evaluated by measuring number of eggs per seed by the bruchid (oviposition), number of holes per seed (adult emergence), percent of seed damage and seed weight loss (%). Both accessions of P. fulvum (AWP 600, AWP 601) and one accession each of P. elatius (AWP 442) and P. sativum (ACP 11) had no emergence holes and seed weight loss in both tests. Overall the results suggest that the P. sativum accession, ACP 11, may be used to sustain the damage caused by the pulse beetle without using pesticides during the storage. Additionally, the accessions of wild species (P. elatius—AWP 442 and P. fulvum—AWP 600, AWP 601) that were identified as completely resistant could be used in breeding programs for the improvement of resistant cultivars.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)
    Esen, Azime
    Sari, Hatice
    Erler, Fedai
    Adak, Alper
    Sari, Duygu
    Eker, Tuba
    Canci, Huseyin
    Ikten, Cengiz
    Kahraman, Abdullah
    Toker, Cengiz
    EUPHYTICA, 2019, 215 (04)
  • [2] Correction to: Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)
    Azime Esen
    Hatice Sari
    Fedai Erler
    Alper Adak
    Duygu Sari
    Tuba Eker
    Huseyin Canci
    Cengiz İkten
    Abdullah Kahraman
    Cengiz Toker
    Euphytica, 2019, 215
  • [3] Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) (vol 215, 82, 2019)
    Esen, Azime
    Sari, Hatice
    Erler, Fedai
    Adak, Alper
    Sari, Duygu
    Eker, Tuba
    Canci, Huseyin
    Ikten, Cengiz
    Kahraman, Abdullah
    Toker, Cengiz
    EUPHYTICA, 2019, 215 (10)
  • [4] Screening of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] accessions against pulse- beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)
    Tripathi, Kuldeep
    Chauhan, Sumit Kumar
    Gore, Padmawati G.
    Prasad, T. V.
    Sirinivasan, Kalyani
    Bhalla, Shashi
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2015, 38 (05) : 675 - 680
  • [5] PHYSICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL BASIS OF RESISTANCE IN COWPEA [VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP.] ACCESSIONS TO PULSE-BEETLE, CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS (L.)
    Tripathi, Kuldeep
    Bhalla, Shashi
    Srinivasan, Kalyani
    Prasad, T. V.
    Gautam, R. D.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (05) : 457 - 466
  • [6] Screening of chickpea accessions for resistance against the pulse beetle, Collosobruchus chinensis L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)
    Eker, Tuba
    Erler, Fedai
    Adak, Alper
    Imrek, Baris
    Guven, Halil
    Tosun, Hilal Sule
    Sari, Duygu
    Sari, Hatice
    Upadhyaya, Hari D.
    Toker, Cengiz
    Ikten, Cengiz
    JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2018, 76 : 51 - 57
  • [7] Screening of Comprehensive Panel of Cultivated and Wild Vigna Species for Resistance to Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L.
    Sahu, Prince
    Singh, Mahendra
    Pandey, Rakesh
    Mishra, Mukesh Kumar
    Singh, Akhilesh Kumar
    Singh, Bhupendra Kumar
    Singh, Surendra Kumar
    Rai, Ashutosh
    Chugh, Vishal
    Shukla, Gaurav
    Singh, Saurabh
    Singh, Kartikey
    Kumar, Mukul
    Singh, Chandra Mohan
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2023, 12 (06):
  • [8] Searching for resistance in wild Lens species against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.)
    Gore, Padmavati G.
    Tripathi, K.
    Chauhan, S. K.
    Singh, Mohar
    Bisht, I. S.
    Bhalla, S.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2016, 39 (04) : 630 - 636
  • [9] Screening for Resistance Against Pulse Beetle, Callosobruchus analis (F.) in Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) Accessions
    Soumia P.S.
    Srivastava C.
    Dikshit H.K.
    Guru Pirasanna Pandi G.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2017, 87 (2) : 551 - 558
  • [10] EFFICACY OF SOME BOTANICALS AGAINST PULSE BEETLE, CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS (L.) IN CHICKPEA
    Sharma, Rupesh
    Devi, Renu
    Sharma, Ramesh Kumar
    Mehla, J. C.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2013, 36 (02) : 125 - 130