Bone morphogenetic protein 7 and autologous bone graft in revision surgery for non-union after lumbar interbody fusion

[1] Boos N(1997)Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view Eur Spine J 6 2-18

[2] Webb JK(1993)The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis J Spinal Disord 6 461-472

[3] Bridwell KH(1997)1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation Spine 22 2807-2812

[4] Sedgewick TA(2004)Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis Spine 29 726-733

[5] O’Brien MF(2007)Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures Spine 32 382-387

[6] Lenke LG(2006)Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial Spine 31 2875-2880

[7] Baldus C(2009)Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Spine J 9 623-629

[8] Fischgrund JS(2005)Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients J Spinal Disord Tech 18 337-346

[9] Mackay M(2005)Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results Eur Spine J 14 551-558

[10] Herkowitz HN(1991)Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 802-808

[1] Boos N(1997)Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view Eur Spine J 6 2-18

[2] Webb JK(1993)The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis J Spinal Disord 6 461-472

[3] Bridwell KH(1997)1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation Spine 22 2807-2812

[4] Sedgewick TA(2004)Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis Spine 29 726-733

[5] O’Brien MF(2007)Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures Spine 32 382-387

[6] Lenke LG(2006)Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial Spine 31 2875-2880

[7] Baldus C(2009)Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Spine J 9 623-629

[8] Fischgrund JS(2005)Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients J Spinal Disord Tech 18 337-346

[9] Mackay M(2005)Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results Eur Spine J 14 551-558

[10] Herkowitz HN(1991)Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 802-808