Molecular analysis of kabuli and desi type of Indian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars using STMS markers

被引:0
|
作者
H. Rizvi
B. Kalyana Babu
P. K. Agrawal
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Pulses Research,Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering (MBGE)
[2] Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (GBPUA & T),Biotechnology Unit, Crop Improvement Division
[3] Vivekanand Parvateeya Krishi Anusanthan Sansthan (VPKAS),undefined
来源
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology | 2014年 / 23卷
关键词
Chickpea; STMS; Polymorphism information content; Diversity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fifty one Sequence tagged microsatellite sites (STMS) primer pairs were employed to assess the genetic diversity and relationships with morphological characters among the sixty-eight chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars of India. A total of 32 out of 51 STMS primers were found polymorphic and a total of 121 alleles were generated out of which 102 (83 %) were detected for the 32 polymorphic STMS markers with an average of 2.22 alleles per locus. The PIC values of all the polymorphic loci ranged from 0.15 (TS82) to 0.69 (TS29) with the mean value of 0.27. Three primers showed PIC value of more than 0.60. The highest PIC value was observed for the primer TS29 (0.69), succeeded by the primer GA 11 (0.61) and TS71 (0.60). Gene diversity (He) was observed in the range of 0.16 (TS82) to 0.74 (TS29) with an average value of 0.33. The heterozygosity (Ho) was observed to be 0.39 (average) with a range of 0.04 (TA18) to 1.00 (TA76, STMS 5, TA72 and TA122). Based on the above STMS marker analysis by considering the parameters of PIC value (≥0.55), gene diversity (≥0.62), and polymorphic alleles (≥4), six highly polymorphic STMS loci GA11, TA76S, TA89, TS29, TS43 and TS71 were observed which can effectively be used in further molecular studies. Dendrogram generated by the UPGMA analysis and POWER MARKER v3.0 showed similar results and there was no clear demarcation of Kabuli and Desi genotypes. The present study resulted in identification of highly distinct genotypes JG 130 and C 235 (57 %) followed by two pairs of genotypes B 108 and JG 11 (57.8 %) and, JG 315 and RSG 2 (59 %) which can be used effectively in a breeding programs in order to develop transgressive segregants with wider genetic base and better promising genotypes. Effective use of these three pairs of chickpea genotypes is expected to give better products for the development of higher yielding Kabuli and Desi genotypes with tolerance/resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and quality traits.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 60
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of molecular markers linked to flowering time genes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Nunavath, Aswini
    Hegde, Venkatraman
    Bharadwaj, Chellapilla
    Tripathi, Shailesh
    Kumar, Rajendra
    Jain, Pradeep Kumar
    Singh, Rajesh Kumar
    Sachdeva, Supriya
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2022, 82 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [22] STMS (sequence tagged microsatellite site) molecular markers as a valuable tool to confirm controlled crosses in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) breeding programs
    C. Caballo
    P. Castro
    J. Gil
    I. Izquierdo
    T. Millan
    J. Rubio
    Euphytica, 2018, 214
  • [23] DETERMINATION OF GENETIC RELATIONSHIP IN TURKISH CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) GENOTYPES USING SSR MOLECULAR MARKERS AND CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS
    Atalay, E.
    Babaoglu, M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 2012, 22 (02) : 369 - 375
  • [24] Sequence-tagged microsatellite site markers for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Hüttel, B
    Winter, P
    Weising, H
    Choumane, W
    Weigand, F
    Kahl, G
    GENOME, 1999, 42 (02) : 210 - 217
  • [25] Genetic basis of pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) resistance and grain yield in desi and Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under unprotected conditions
    Gowda, CLL
    Ramesh, S
    Chandra, S
    Upadhyaya, HD
    EUPHYTICA, 2005, 145 (1-2) : 199 - 214
  • [26] Genetic basis of pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) resistance and grain yield in desi and Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under unprotected conditions
    C. L. L. Gowda
    S. Ramesh
    S. Chandra
    H. D. Upadhyaya
    Euphytica, 2005, 145 : 199 - 214
  • [27] TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) CULTIVARS GROWN UNDER NATURAL CONDITIONS
    Ozaktan, Hamdi
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2021, 26 (02) : 235 - 243
  • [28] Comprehensive functional analysis and mapping of SSR markers in the chickpea genome (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Asadi, AliAkbar
    Ebrahimi, Amin
    Rashidi-Monfared, Sajad
    Basiri, Mohammad
    Akbari-Afjani, Javad
    COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 84
  • [29] Phenotypic variability, path analysis and molecular diversity analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
    Gediya L.N.
    Patel D.A.
    Kumar S.
    Kumar D.
    Parmar D.J.
    Patel S.S.
    Vegetos, 2019, 32 (2): : 167 - 180
  • [30] Genetic fingerprinting of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm using ISSR markers and their relationships
    Bhagyawant, S. S.
    Srivastava, N.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 7 (24): : 4428 - 4431