Observer variation in chest radiography of acute lower respiratory infections in children: A systematic review

被引:37
作者
Swingler G.H. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Child/Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Red Cross Children's Hospital, Cape Town 7700, Klipfontein Road
关键词
Kappa Statistic; Observer Variation; Radiographic Feature; Acute Lower Respiratory Infection; Observer Agreement;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2342-1-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Knowledge of the accuracy of chest radiograph findings in acute lower respiratory infection in children is important when making clinical decisions. Methods: I conducted a systematic review of agreement between and within observers in the detection of radiographic features of acute lower respiratory infections in children, and described the quality of the design and reporting of studies, whether included or excluded from the review. Included studies were those of observer variation in the interpretation of radiographic features of lower respiratory infection in children (neonatal nurseries excluded) in which radiographs were read independently and a clinical population was studied. I searched MEDLINE, HealthSTAR and HSRPROJ databases (1966 to 1999), handsearched the reference lists of identified papers and contacted authors of identified studies. I performed the data extraction alone. Results: Ten studies of observer interpretation of radiographic features of lower respiratory infection in children were identified. Seven of the studies satisfied four or more of the seven design and reporting criteria. Six studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. Inter-observer agreement varied with the radiographic feature examined. Kappa statistics ranged from around 0.80 for individual radiographic features to 0.27-0.38 for bacterial vs viral etiology. Conclusions: Little information was identified on observer agreement on radiographic features of lower respiratory tract infections in children. Agreement varied with the features assessed from " fair" to "very good". Aspects of the quality of the methods and reporting need attention in future studies, particularly the description of criteria for radiographic features. © 2001 Swingler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Lijmer J.G., Mol B.W., Heisterkamp S., Bonsel G.J., Prins M.H., van der Meulen J.H., Bossuyt P.M., Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests, JAMA, 282, pp. 1061-1066, (1999)
[2]  
Jaeschke R., Guyatt G., Sackett D.L., Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid?, JAMA, 271, pp. 389-391, (1994)
[3]  
Greenhalgh T., How to read a paper. Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests, BMJ, 315, pp. 540-543, (1997)
[4]  
Reid M.C., Lachs M.S., Feinstein A.R., Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good, JAMA, 274, pp. 645-651, (1995)
[5]  
(1996)
[6]  
Fleiss J.L., Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, pp. 212-225, (1981)
[7]  
Coblentz C.L., Babcook C.J., Alton D., Riley B.J., Norman G., Observer variation in detecting the radiographic features associated with bronchiolitis, Invest. Radiol., 26, pp. 115-118, (1991)
[8]  
Coakley F.V., Green J., Lamont A.C., Rickett A.B., An investigation into perihilar inflammatory change on the chest radiographs of children admitted with acute respiratory symptoms, Clin. Radiol., 51, pp. 614-617, (1996)
[9]  
Crain E.F., Bulas D., Bijur P.E., Goldman H.S., Is a chest radiograph necessary in the evaluation of every febrile infant less than 8 weeks of age?, Pediatrics, 88, pp. 821-824, (1991)
[10]  
Davies H.D., Wang E.E., Manson D., Babyn P., Shuckett B., Reliability of the chest radiograph in the diagnosis of lower respiratory infections in young children, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 15, pp. 600-604, (1996)