The World Trade Organization and organic food trade: Potential for restricting protectionism?

被引:5
作者
Carsten Daugbjerg
机构
[1] Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C
关键词
Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade; Codex Alimentarius; Organic standards; Trade; World Trade Organization;
D O I
10.1007/s13165-012-0024-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper outlines the global food regulation regime and its institutions, focussing upon the way in which these address organic food trade. While the WTO agreements have rules for scientifically based policy measures adopted to protect human, animal or plant health or life, there is some disagreement on whether the WTO's Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (addresses food labelling) covers production standards based on ethical values such as those defining organic food standards. Another problem is that two sets of international standards for organic food exist-the Codex Alimentarius guidelines and the standards of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. Finally, many certification bodies are private organisations certifying on the basis of government standards. This blurs the distinction between private and public and questions whether WTO rules apply to these private organisations. It is concluded that this current state of affairs entails that organic food standards can potentially be used by governments as technical barriers to trade to protect their domestic organic producers from international competition. In the concluding section, the potential for improving the global organic food trade regime is discussed. © 2012 Springer Science & Business Media BV.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Bostrom M., Klintman M., State-centered versus nonstate-driven organic food standardization: a comparison of the US and Sweden, Agr Hum Val, 23, 2, pp. 163-180, (2006)
  • [2] Botterill L.C., Daugbjerg C., Engaging with private sector standards: a case study of GLOBALG.A.P, Aust J Int Aff, 65, 4, pp. 488-504, (2011)
  • [3] Bowen D., Current mechanisms that enable international trade in organic products, Harmonization and equivalency in organic agriculture: Background papers of the International Task Force on Harmonization and Equivalency in Organic Agriculture, 1, pp. 25-46, (2004)
  • [4] Clark L.F., Organics limited: The corporate rise and spectacular change in the Canadian and American organic food sectors, (2007)
  • [5] Guidelines for the production, processing, labelling and marketing of organically produced foods, Rome: Codex Alimentarius Commission, (1999)
  • [6] Guidelines for the production, processing, labelling and marketing of organically produced foods, Organically Produced Foods, (2007)
  • [7] Commins K., Overview over current status of standards and conformity assessment systems, Harmonization and equivalency in organic agriculture: Background papers of the international task force on harmonization and equivalency in organic agriculture, 1, pp. 1-23, (2004)
  • [8] Courville S., Crucefix D., Existing and potential models and mechanisms for harmonization, equivalency and mutual recognition, Harmonization and equivalency in organic agriculture: Background papers of the international task force on harmonization and equivalency in organic agriculture, 1, pp. 47-103, (2004)
  • [9] Darby M.R., Karni E., Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud, J Law Econ, 16, 1, pp. 67-88, (1973)
  • [10] Daugbjerg C., Halpin D., Generating policy capacity in emerging green industries: the development of organic farming in Denmark and Australia, J Environ Pol Plann, 12, 2, pp. 141-157, (2010)