Peers and Fertility Preferences: An Empirical Investigation of the Role of Neighbours, Religion and Education

被引:0
作者
Ankita Mishra
Jaai Parasnis
机构
[1] RMIT University,School of Economics, Finance and Marketing
[2] Monash University,Department of Economics
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2017年 / 134卷
关键词
Peer effects; Multinomial logit; Fertility; India; Education; Wealth status; D12; J13;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Individual fertility preference is influenced by observed social norms. The present paper investigates the effect of the observed fertility of peers on a woman’s fertility preference. We explore the role of two peer groups: neighbourhood peers and religious peers. Data from the National Family Health Surveys (1992–1993, 1998–1999 and 2005–2006) in India is employed for empirical estimations using a multinomial logit model. We find that both neighbourhood and religious peers have a significant impact on individual fertility preferences, but their relative importance changes with family size. An increase in peer fertility increases the probability of preferring more children. We further examine the roles of education and wealth as transmission channels between the fertility norms of peers to the fertility preferences of the women and find that education plays an important role in moderating peer influences. These findings can serve as vital inputs in formulating family planning and gender policies.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 357
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Akerlof G(1997)Social distance and social decisions Econometrica 65 1005-1027
[2]  
Axinn W(1994)Family influences on family size preferences Demography 31 65-79
[3]  
Marin EC(2012)Fertility choice under child mortality and social norms Economics Letters 115 338-341
[4]  
Thornton A(1990)Education, income and desired fertility in Egypt: A revised perspective Economic Development and Cultural Change 38 313-339
[5]  
Bhattacharya J(2003)How well do desired fertility measures for husbands and wives predict subsequent fertility? Evidence from Malaysia Asia-Pacific Population Journal 18 5-24
[6]  
Chakraborty S(2001)Fertility, education and development: Evidence from India Population and Development Review 27 33-63
[7]  
Cochrane SH(2001)School-based peer effects and juvenile behavior Review of Economics and Statistics 83 257-268
[8]  
Kahn MA(2011)Son preference in Indian families: Absolute versus relative wealth effects Demography 48 343-370
[9]  
Ibrahim I(2003)A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory Population and Development Review 29 349-374
[10]  
Da Vanzo J(2012)From desires to behaviour: Moderating factors in a fertility transition Demographic Research 26 511-542