Subcutaneous infusion of exenatide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Christian T. Ruff
Michelle Baron
KyungAh Im
Michelle L. O’Donoghue
Fred T. Fiedorek
Marc S. Sabatine
机构
[1] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
[2] Harvard Medical School,undefined
[3] Intarcia Therapeutics,undefined
来源
Nature Medicine | 2022年 / 28卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) injected periodically have been shown to not increase and, for some members of this class, decrease the risk of cardiovascular events. The cardiovascular safety of delivering a continuous subcutaneous infusion of the GLP-1RA exenatide (ITCA 650) is unknown. Here, we randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes with, or at risk for, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) to receive ITCA 650 or placebo to assess cardiovascular safety in a pre-approval trial (NCT01455896). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or hospitalization for unstable angina. On the basis of 2008 guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, a non-inferiority margin of 1.8 for the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the hazard ratio (HR) was used. We randomized 4,156 patients (2,075 assigned to receive ITCA 650 and 2,081 assigned to receive placebo) who were followed for a median of 16 months. The primary outcome occurred in 4.6% (95/2,075) of patients in the ITCA 650 group and 3.8% (79/2,081) of patients in the placebo group, meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority criterion (HR = 1.21, 95% CI, 0.90–1.63, Pnon-inferiority = 0.004). Serious adverse events were similar between the two groups. Adverse events were more frequent in the ITCA 650 group (72%, 1,491/2,074) than in the placebo group (63.9%, 1,325/2,070), mainly due to an increase in gastrointestinal events and disorders while on ITCA 650. In patients with type 2 diabetes with, or at risk for, ASCVD, ITCA 650 was non-inferior to placebo. A larger and longer-duration cardiovascular outcomes trial is needed to define more precisely the cardiovascular effects of ITCA 650 in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Emerging Risk Factors C(2015)Association of cardiometabolic multimorbidity with mortality JAMA 314 52-60
[2]  
Menke A(2015)Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, 1988–2012 JAMA 314 1021-1029
[3]  
Casagrande S(2019)Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 7 776-785
[4]  
Geiss L(2019)SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials Lancet 393 31-39
[5]  
Cowie CC(2019)Comparison of the effects of glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus Circulation 139 2022-2031
[6]  
Kristensen SL(2017)Effects of once-weekly exenatide on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes N. Engl. J. Med. 377 1228-1239
[7]  
Zelniker TA(2013)A randomized, open-label, multicenter, 4-week study to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ITCA 650 in patients with type 2 diabetes Clin. Ther. 35 634-645
[8]  
Zelniker TA(2013)Randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous delivery of exenatide by ITCA 650 versus twice-daily exenatide injections in metformin-treated type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 36 2559-2565
[9]  
Holman RR(2014)Continuous subcutaneous delivery of exenatide via ITCA 650 leads to sustained glycemic control and weight loss for 48 weeks in metformin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes J. Diabetes Complications 28 393-398
[10]  
Henry RR(2018)Treatment satisfaction with ITCA 650, a novel drug-device delivering continuous exenatide, versus twice-daily injections of exenatide in type 2 diabetics using metformin Diabetes Obes. Metab. 20 638-645