Freedom and need: The evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England

被引：12
|
作者：
Shergold M. [1 ]
Grant J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, Milton Road
来源：
Health Research Policy and Systems | / 6卷 / 1期
基金：
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词：
National Health Service; Medical Research Council; Priority Setting; Government Department; Chief Medical Officer;
D O I：
10.1186/1478-4505-6-2
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The optimal support of health-related research and development with public money is a complex challenge. Over the last century, policy makers in England have conceived and implemented a variety of models, ranging from independent, curiosity driven research to needs-based state commissions, and promoting different bodies to oversee scientific work. This paper traces these approaches, identifies the principles that drove them, and discusses their role in shaping policy for publicly funded health research, up to the recent launch of a new research strategy by the Department of Health. © 2008 Shergold and Grant; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: what they fund and how they distribute their funds
    Viergever, Roderik F.
    Hendriks, Thom C. C.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 14
  • [22] Influences on recruitment to randomised controlled trials in mental health settings in England: a national cross-sectional survey of researchers working for the Mental Health Research Network
    Rohan Borschmann
    Sue Patterson
    Dilkushi Poovendran
    Danielle Wilson
    Tim Weaver
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [23] Influences on recruitment to randomised controlled trials in mental health settings in England: a national cross-sectional survey of researchers working for the Mental Health Research Network
    Borschmann, Rohan
    Patterson, Sue
    Poovendran, Dilkushi
    Wilson, Danielle
    Weaver, Tim
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [24] What are Important Ways of Sharing Power in Health Research Priority Setting? Perspectives From People With Lived Experience and Members of the Public
    Pratt, Bridget
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2021, 16 (03) : 200 - 211
  • [25] Priority-setting in public health research funding organisations: an exploratory qualitative study among five high-profile funders
    Yuri Cartier
    Maria I. Creatore
    Steven J. Hoffman
    Louise Potvin
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [26] Priority-setting in public health research funding organisations: an exploratory qualitative study among five high-profile funders
    Cartier, Yuri
    Creatore, Maria I.
    Hoffmann, Steven J.
    Potvin, Louise
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [27] The NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy
    Gill Harvey
    Louise Fitzgerald
    Sandra Fielden
    Anne McBride
    Heather Waterman
    David Bamford
    Roman Kislov
    Ruth Boaden
    Implementation Science, 6
123