Impact of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System (PROMIS) upon the Design and Operation of Multi-center Clinical Trials: a Qualitative Research Study

被引:0
作者
Eric L. Eisenstein
Lawrence W. Diener
Meredith Nahm
Kevin P. Weinfurt
机构
[1] Duke University Medical Center,Duke Clinical Research Institute
[2] Duke University Medical Center,Duke Translational Medicine Institute
来源
Journal of Medical Systems | 2011年 / 35卷
关键词
Clinical trial; Data collection; Information systems; Outcomes assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
New technologies may be required to integrate the National Institutes of Health’s Patient Reported Outcome Management Information System (PROMIS) into multi-center clinical trials. To better understand this need, we identified likely PROMIS reporting formats, developed a multi-center clinical trial process model, and identified gaps between current capabilities and those necessary for PROMIS. These results were evaluated by key trial constituencies. Issues reported by principal investigators fell into two categories: acceptance by key regulators and the scientific community, and usability for researchers and clinicians. Issues reported by the coordinating center, participating sites, and study subjects were those faced when integrating new technologies into existing clinical trial systems. We then defined elements of a PROMIS Tool Kit required for integrating PROMIS into a multi-center clinical trial environment. The requirements identified in this study serve as a framework for future investigators in the design, development, implementation, and operation of PROMIS Tool Kit technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1530
页数:9
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [21] Genel M(2007)Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study BMC Health Serv. Res. 7 85-525
  • [22] Woolf SH(2000)Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group JAMA. 284 357-103
  • [23] Mercer SL(2000)Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group JAMA. 284 478-undefined
  • [24] DeVinney BJ(1996)Sampling for qualitative research Fam. Pract. 13 522-undefined
  • [25] Fine LJ(1992)Turning anecdotes into data—the critical incident technique Fam. Pract. 9 98-undefined
  • [26] Green LW(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [27] Dougherty D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [28] Campbell M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [29] Fitzpatrick R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [30] Haines A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined