Integrated Model for Soft Drink Industry Supply Chain Risk Assessment: Implications for Sustainability in Emerging Economies

被引:0
作者
Ahmed Shoyeb Raihan
Syed Mithun Ali
Sanjeeb Roy
Miki Das
Golam Kabir
Sanjoy Kumar Paul
机构
[1] Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology,Department of Industrial and Production Engineering
[2] University of Regina,Industrial Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science
[3] University of Technology Sydney,UTS Business School
来源
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems | 2022年 / 24卷
关键词
Soft drink supply chain; Risk assessment; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Supply chain risk management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recently, the soft drink industry has been confronted with a rapidly changing business climate and increased competition, creating risks and uncertainties in its supply chain. Thus, immediate actions are required to handle these risks and uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to identify and classify these risks in the soft drink supply chain and to develop a methodology comprising a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of these risks. FAHP was used to determine the weights of five major risk categories and 23 sub risks under these major categories. Afterward, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method (FCEM) was applied for the assessment of overall risk level, risk levels of the five major categories and relative risk levels of the 23 sub risks. This research has been conducted focusing on the soft drink industry of Bangladesh, a developing country with an emerging economy. In the existing literature, this work contributes by identifying and evaluating risks in the soft drink supply chain in the context of Bangladesh. The outcome of this study indicates that the overall risk level in the supply chain of the soft drink industry is between low and medium, and the risk level of the demand risks is the highest whereas the risk level of infrastructural risks is the lowest. It was also found that loss of reputation and brand image is the most significant sub risk, and natural disasters are the least significant sub risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1148 / 1169
页数:21
相关论文
共 292 条
  • [1] Slagmulder R(2018)Transforming under deep uncertainty: a strategic perspective on risk management Bus. Horiz. 61 733-743
  • [2] Devoldere B(2020)The role of fuzzy logic to dealing with epistemic uncertainty in supply chain risk assessment: review standpoints Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 104 375-390
  • [3] Dıaz-Curbelo A(2015)Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: a case study Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 38 2328-2344
  • [4] Andrade RAE(2014)An analysis of the structural complexity of supply chain networks Appl. Math. Model. 16 474-483
  • [5] Municio AMG(2011)Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP) Supply Chain Manage. 82 102-113
  • [6] Mangla SK(2004)The triple-A supply chain Harv. Bus. Rev. 126 121-129
  • [7] Kumar P(2010)Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory Int. J. Prod. Econ. 51 2433-2442
  • [8] Barua MK(2002)A conceptual framework of vulnerability in firms’ inbound and outbound logistics flows Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 171 455-470
  • [9] Cheng C(2013)Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS Int. J. Prod. Res. 23 313-339
  • [10] Chen T(2016)Supply chain sustainability: a risk management approach Int. J. Prod. Econ. 247 1-15