Spectrum Monitoring Based on End-to-End Learning by Deep Learning

被引:0
作者
Mahdiyeh Rahmani
Reza Ghazizadeh
机构
[1] Birjand University,Department of Telecommunication Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering
来源
International Journal of Wireless Information Networks | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Machine learning; Spectrum monitoring; Modulation recognition; Wireless technology; Deep learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Numerous autonomous wireless deployments have become invaluable for understanding and investigating the radio frequency environment. However, machine learning techniques have their drawbacks and there are situations where such strategies are unreliable. The purpose of the present paper is to present an end-to-end learning framework based on deep learning (DL) and to evaluate different methods of wireless signal classifiers implementation and signal representation for spectrum monitoring. Furthermore, we tend to investigate the significance of wireless data representation selection for varied spectrum monitoring tasks. For each case study, modulation recognition (MR) and wireless interference identification (IId), three deep learning networks are evaluated for the subsequent wireless signal representations, temporal I/Q data, the amplitude/phase, frequency domain and Hilbert and wavelet transform representations. From our analysis, the accuracy of wireless signal identification is proved to be affected by the network classifier and wireless data representation. For different signal-to-noise ratio values, the classification accuracy of the three DL networks are evaluated. The results of the experiments indicate that the representation of data influences network accuracy. In MR case, in high SNR (18), the first, second and third networks have the best results in the db3 mother wavelet, amplitude/phase and Hilbert samples, respectively. In the medium and low SNR (0, − 8) in all three networks, almost the best results is obtained from Hilbert data representation with the accuracy variation up to 4%. In IId case, for three SNR (− 8, 0, 18) in the three presented networks almost the best results is obtained from the FFT and wavelet data representations with 0.5% accuracy variations.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 192
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ahmad WSHMW(2020)5G technology: Towards dynamic spectrum sharing using cognitive radio networks IEEE Access 8 14460-14488
[2]  
Höyhtyä M(2016)Spectrum occupancy measurements: A survey and use of interference maps IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18 2386-2414
[3]  
Beltrán F(2017)Accelerating the introduction of spectrum sharing using market-based mechanisms IEEE Communications Standards Magazine 1 66-72
[4]  
Xu T(2020)Intelligent Spectrum Sensing: When Reinforcement Learning Meets Automatic Repeat Sensing in 5G Communications IEEE Wireless Communications 27 46-53
[5]  
Zhou T(2017)An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking 3 563-575
[6]  
Tian J(2017)Radio frequency interference mitigation using deep convolutional neural networks Astronomy and Computing 18 35-39
[7]  
Sang J(2018)Deep learning models for wireless signal classification with distributed low-cost spectrum sensors IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking 4 433-445
[8]  
Hu H(2018)End-to-end learning from spectrum data: A deep learning approach for wireless signal identification in spectrum monitoring applications IEEE Access 6 18484-18501
[9]  
O’Shea T(2019)Enhancing the coexistence of lte and wi-fi in unlicensed spectrum through convolutional neural networks IEEE Access 7 28464-28477
[10]  
Hoydis J(2021)CGDNet: Efficient hybrid deep learning model for robust automatic modulation recognition IEEE Networking Letters 3 47-51