The FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial: patient-reported outcomes in clinical genetic sequencing for colorectal cancer

被引:0
作者
Sukh Makhnoon
Deborah J. Bowen
Brian H. Shirts
Stephanie M. Fullerton
Eric B. Larson
James D. Ralston
Kathleen A. Leppig
David R. Crosslin
David Veenstra
Gail P. Jarvik
机构
[1] University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Behavioral Science
[2] University of Washington,Department of Bioethics and Humanities
[3] University of Washington,Department of Laboratory Medicine
[4] Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,Genetic Services
[5] Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education
[6] University of Washington,Department of Pharmacy
[7] University of Washington,Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences
[8] University of Washington Medical Center,undefined
来源
Cancer Causes & Control | 2021年 / 32卷
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Randomized controlled trial; Genetic testing; Privacy; Confidentiality; Electronic medical record;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As genetics gains favor in clinical oncology, it is important to address patient concerns around confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic information that might otherwise limit its utilization. We designed a randomized controlled trial to assess the social impact of an online educational tool (FamilyTalk) to increase family communication about colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and screening. Of 208 randomized participants, 149 (71.6%) returned six-month surveys. Overall, there was no difference in CRC screening between the study arms. Privacy and confidentiality concerns about medical and genetic information, reactions to genetic test results, and lifestyle changes did not differ between arms. Participants with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) and variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results were more likely than those with negative results to report that the results accurately predicted their disease risks (OR 5.37, p = 0.02 and OR 3.13, p = 0.02, respectively). This trial demonstrated no evidence that FamilyTalk impacted patient-reported outcomes. Low power, due to the limited number of participants with P/LP results in the overall sample, as well as the short follow-up period, could have contributed to the null findings.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 492
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Hampel H(2009)Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer Surg Oncol Clin N Am 18 687-703
  • [2] Peterson EB(2018)Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: a landscape analysis of reviews Transl Behav Med 8 59-70
  • [3] Clayton EW(2018)A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States PLoS ONE 13 e0204417-1819
  • [4] Musa J(2017)Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis PLoS ONE 12 e0183924-610
  • [5] Bennett S(2016)Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11 CD008144-2282
  • [6] Faury S(2017)Patient education interventions for colorectal cancer patients with stoma: a systematic review Patient Educ Couns 100 1807-138
  • [7] Usher-Smith JA(2018)Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials BMJ Open 8 e017717-478
  • [8] Edwards AG(2013)Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 CD001865-381
  • [9] Lowery JT(2014)A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23 601-949
  • [10] Esplen MJ(2019)Telephone versus in-person colorectal cancer risk and screening intervention for first-degree relatives: a randomized controlled trial Cancer 125 2272-870