Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems

被引：86

作者：

Falez F. ^{[1
]}

Casella F. ^{[1
]}

Panegrossi G. ^{[1
]}

Favetti F. ^{[1
]}

Barresi C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department Orthopaedic and Traumatology, S. Spirito in Sassia Hospital, 00100 Rome

来源：

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | 2008年 / 9卷 / 1期

关键词：

Arthroplasty; Conservative; DEXA; Hip; Metaphyseal;

D O I：

10.1007/s10195-008-0105-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Total hip replacement is showing, during the last decades, a progressive evolution toward principles of reduced bone and soft tissue aggression. These principles have become the basis of a new philosophy, tissue sparing surgery. Regarding hip implants, new conservative components have been proposed and developed as an alternative to conventional stems. Technical and biomechanical characteristics of metaphyseal bone-stock-preserving stems are analyzed on the basis of the available literature and our personal experience. Mayo, Nanos and Metha stems represent, under certain aspects, a design evolution starting from shared concepts: reduced femoral violation, non-anatomic geometry, proximal calcar loading and lateral alignment. However, consistent differences are level of neck preservation, cross-sectional geometry and surface finishing. The Mayo component is the most time-tested component and, in our hands, it showed an excellent survivorship at the mid-term follow-up, with an extremely reduced incidence of aseptic loosening (partially reduced by the association with last generation acetabular couplings). For 160 implants followed for a mean of 4.7 years, survivorship was 97.5% with 4 failed implants: one fracture with unstable stem, 1 septic loosening and 2 aseptic mobilizations. DEXA analysis, performed on 15 cases, showed a good calcar loading and stimulation, but there was significant lateral load transfer to R3-R4 zones, giving to the distal part of the stem a function not simply limited to alignment. Metaphyseal conservative stems demonstrated a wide applicability with an essential surgical technique. Moreover, they offer the options of a conservative revision" with a conventional primary component in case of failure and a "conservative revision" for failed resurfacing implants. © Springer-Verlag Italia 2008."

引用

页码：49 / 54

页数：5

共 13 条

[1]

Pipino F., Keller A., Tissue-sparing surgery: 25 years' experience with femoral neck preserving hip arthroplasty, J Orthop Traumatol, 7, 1, pp. 36-41, (2006)

[2]

Carlson L., Albrektsson B., Freeman M.A., Femoral neck retention in hip arthroplasty. A cadaver study of mechanical effects, Acta Orthop Scand, 59, 1, pp. 6-8, (1988)

[3]

Pipino F., Calderale P.M., Biodynamic total hip prosthesis, Ital J Orthop Traumatol, 13, 3, pp. 289-297, (1987)

[4]

Jasty M., Krushell R., Zalenski E., O'Connor D., Sedlacek R., Harris W., The contribution of the nonporous distal stem to the stability of proximally porous-coated canine femoral components, J Arthroplasty, 8, 1, pp. 33-41, (1993)

[5]

Whiteside L.A., White S.E., McCarthy D.S., Effect of neck resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip replacement, Am J Orthop, 10, pp. 766-770, (1995)

[6]

Morrey B.F., Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 249, pp. 169-175, (1989)

[7]

Morrey B.F., Adams R.A., Kessler M., A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 82, 7, pp. 952-958, (2000)

[8]

Swanson T.V., The tapered press fit total hip arthroplasty: A European alternative, J Arthroplasty, 20, 4 SUPPL. 2, pp. 63-67, (2005)

[9]

Meldrum R.D., Willie B.M., Bloebaum R.D., An assessment of the biological fixation of a retrieved Mayo femoral component, Iowa Orthop J, 23, pp. 103-107, (2003)

[10]

Albanese C.V., Rendine M., De Palama F., Et al., Bone remodelling in YHA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report, Hip Int, 16, pp. 9-15, (2006)

← 1 2 →