A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures

被引:0
作者
Mark G. Stewart
John Mueller
机构
[1] The University of Newcastle,Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability
[2] Ohio State University,Mershon Center for International Security Studies and Department of Political Science
关键词
Terrorism; Security; Risk; Cost-benefit analysis; Aviation;
D O I
10.1007/s12198-008-0013-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper seeks to discover whether aviation security measures are cost-effective by considering their effectiveness, their cost and expected lives saved as a result of such expenditure. An assessment of the Federal Air Marshal Service suggests that the annual cost is $180 million per life saved. This is greatly in excess of the regulatory safety goal (societal willingness to pay to save a life) of $1–$10 million per life saved. As such, the air marshal program fails a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the opportunity cost of these expenditures is considerable, and it is highly likely that far more lives would have been saved if the money had been invested instead in a wide range of more cost-effective risk mitigation programs. On the other hand, hardening of cockpit doors has an annual cost of only $800,00 per life saved, showing that this is a cost-effective security measure.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Quality-of-Life and Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Home Environmental Assessment Program in Connecticut [J].
Nguyen, Kimberly H. ;
Boulay, Eileen ;
Peng, Justin .
JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2011, 48 (02) :147-155
[32]   Cyber Security Investment Cost-Benefit Investigation Using System Dynamics Modelling [J].
Oosthuizen, Rudolph ;
Pretorius, Leon ;
Mouton, Francois ;
Molekoa, Mirriam .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY (ICCWS 2019), 2019, :304-314
[33]   Incorporation of Rebound Effect into Energy Efficient Measures Cost-Benefit Analysis Model [J].
Poon, Ivan .
2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES (ICBEST), 2015, :90-94
[34]   Integrating life-cycle assessment into transport cost-benefit analysis [J].
Manzo, Stefano ;
Salling, Kim Bang .
TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 :273-282
[35]   Cost-benefit analysis in integrated environmental assessment: Some methodological issues [J].
Munda, G .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 19 (02) :157-168
[36]   When a Gift Is Not a Gift: Collection Assessment Using Cost-Benefit Analysis [J].
Ballestro, John ;
Howze, Philip C. .
COLLECTION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 30 (03) :49-66
[37]   Cost-Benefit Assessment Challenges for a Smart Distribution System: A Case Study [J].
Sun, Lisha ;
Thomas, Jeffrey ;
Singh, Shashwat ;
Li, Daixi ;
Baran, Mesut ;
Lubkeman, David ;
DeCarolis, Joe ;
de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo ;
White, Leonard ;
Watts, Steve .
2017 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2017,
[38]   A micro-scale cost-benefit analysis of building-level flood risk adaptation measures in Los Angeles [J].
de Ruig, Lars T. ;
Haer, Toon ;
de Moel, Hans ;
Botzen, W. J. Wouter ;
Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H. .
WATER RESOURCES AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 32
[39]   Decision trees in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management plans [J].
Napolitano, Jacopo ;
Di Francesco, Massimo ;
Sechi, Giovanni Maria .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2024, 26 (04) :762-778
[40]   Cost-Benefit Analysis for Optimization of Risk Protection Under Budget Constraints [J].
Spackova, Olga ;
Straub, Daniel .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (05) :941-959