A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures

被引:0
作者
Mark G. Stewart
John Mueller
机构
[1] The University of Newcastle,Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability
[2] Ohio State University,Mershon Center for International Security Studies and Department of Political Science
关键词
Terrorism; Security; Risk; Cost-benefit analysis; Aviation;
D O I
10.1007/s12198-008-0013-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper seeks to discover whether aviation security measures are cost-effective by considering their effectiveness, their cost and expected lives saved as a result of such expenditure. An assessment of the Federal Air Marshal Service suggests that the annual cost is $180 million per life saved. This is greatly in excess of the regulatory safety goal (societal willingness to pay to save a life) of $1–$10 million per life saved. As such, the air marshal program fails a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the opportunity cost of these expenditures is considerable, and it is highly likely that far more lives would have been saved if the money had been invested instead in a wide range of more cost-effective risk mitigation programs. On the other hand, hardening of cockpit doors has an annual cost of only $800,00 per life saved, showing that this is a cost-effective security measure.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A Relative Cost-Benefit Approach for Evaluating Alternative Airport Security Policies [J].
Shim, Woohyun ;
Massacci, Fabio ;
Tedeschi, Alessandra ;
Pollini, Alessandro .
2014 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY (ARES), 2015, :514-522
[22]   Cost-Benefit Analysis and Risk Assessment for Mining Activities in Terms of Circular Economy and Their Environmental Impact [J].
Machairas, Evangelos ;
Varouchakis, Emmanouil A. .
GEOSCIENCES, 2023, 13 (10)
[23]   Assessment of innovative transport concepts using cost-benefit analysis [J].
Melkert, Joris ;
Van Wee, Bert .
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 32 (06) :545-571
[24]   Regulatory assessment for chemicals: a rapid appraisal cost-benefit approach [J].
Pearce, D ;
Koundouri, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2004, 7 (06) :435-449
[25]   Cost-benefit assessment of shore side electricity: An Irish perspective [J].
Gore, Ketan ;
Rigot-Muller, Patrick ;
Coughlan, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326
[26]   Fairness in cost-benefit analysis: A methodology for health technology assessment [J].
Samson, Anne-Laure ;
Schokkaert, Erik ;
Thebaut, Clemence ;
Dormont, Brigitte ;
Fleurbaey, Marc ;
Luchini, Stephane ;
Van de Voorde, Carine .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 27 (01) :102-114
[27]   Cost-Benefit Assessment of Offshore Structures Considering Structural Deterioration [J].
Varela, Gerardo ;
Tolentino, Dante .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (07)
[28]   Assessment of cost-benefit analysis in integration projects on drug addiction [J].
Ates, T ;
Langer, B ;
Erbas, B ;
Tretter, F ;
Wehner, B .
GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2005, 67 (02) :159-162
[29]   Social vulnerability in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management [J].
Kind, Jarl ;
Botzen, W. J. Wouter ;
Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H. .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2020, 25 (02) :115-134
[30]   A cost-benefit analysis of capital requirements adjusted for model risk [J].
Farkas, Walter ;
Fringuellotti, Fulvia ;
Tunaru, Radu .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 65