A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures

被引:0
|
作者
Mark G. Stewart
John Mueller
机构
[1] The University of Newcastle,Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability
[2] Ohio State University,Mershon Center for International Security Studies and Department of Political Science
关键词
Terrorism; Security; Risk; Cost-benefit analysis; Aviation;
D O I
10.1007/s12198-008-0013-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper seeks to discover whether aviation security measures are cost-effective by considering their effectiveness, their cost and expected lives saved as a result of such expenditure. An assessment of the Federal Air Marshal Service suggests that the annual cost is $180 million per life saved. This is greatly in excess of the regulatory safety goal (societal willingness to pay to save a life) of $1–$10 million per life saved. As such, the air marshal program fails a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the opportunity cost of these expenditures is considerable, and it is highly likely that far more lives would have been saved if the money had been invested instead in a wide range of more cost-effective risk mitigation programs. On the other hand, hardening of cockpit doors has an annual cost of only $800,00 per life saved, showing that this is a cost-effective security measure.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures
    Stewart, Mark G.
    Mueller, John
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY, 2008, 1 (03) : 143 - 159
  • [2] Terrorism Risks and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Aviation Security
    Stewart, Mark G.
    Mueller, John
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2013, 33 (05) : 893 - 908
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis of airport security: Are airports too safe?
    Stewart, Mark G.
    Mueller, John
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 35 : 19 - 28
  • [4] VOIP SECURITY: A PERFORMANCE AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    Perigo, Levi
    Gandotra, Rahil
    Gedia, Dewang
    Hussain, Moiz
    Gupta, Praniti
    Bano, Shirin
    Kulkarni, Vineet
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRY, 2020, 8 (02): : 34 - 42
  • [5] The origin of cost-benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
    Jiang, Wei
    Marggraf, Rainer
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [6] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Advanced Imaging Technology Full Body Scanners for Airline Passenger Security Screening
    Stewart, Mark G.
    Mueller, John
    JOURNAL OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 8 (01)
  • [7] Routine second-trimester ultrasonography in the United States: A cost-benefit analysis
    Vintzileos, AM
    Ananth, CV
    Smulian, JC
    Beazoglou, T
    Knuppel, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (03) : 655 - 660
  • [8] Cost-Benefit Analysis of an "Average" Professional Sports Team or Stadium in the United States
    Sepulveda, Cristian F.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2023, 14 (03) : 451 - 477
  • [9] Assessing security measures reducing terrorist risk: inverse ex post cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses of Norwegian airports and seaports
    Akhtar, Juned
    Bjornskau, Torkel
    Veisten, Knut
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY, 2010, 3 (03) : 179 - 195
  • [10] Cost-Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada: a Decision Support Tool
    Huijser, Marcel P.
    Duffield, John W.
    Clevenger, Anthony P.
    Ament, Robert J.
    McGowen, Pat T.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2009, 14 (02):