A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures

被引:0
作者
Mark G. Stewart
John Mueller
机构
[1] The University of Newcastle,Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability
[2] Ohio State University,Mershon Center for International Security Studies and Department of Political Science
关键词
Terrorism; Security; Risk; Cost-benefit analysis; Aviation;
D O I
10.1007/s12198-008-0013-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper seeks to discover whether aviation security measures are cost-effective by considering their effectiveness, their cost and expected lives saved as a result of such expenditure. An assessment of the Federal Air Marshal Service suggests that the annual cost is $180 million per life saved. This is greatly in excess of the regulatory safety goal (societal willingness to pay to save a life) of $1–$10 million per life saved. As such, the air marshal program fails a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the opportunity cost of these expenditures is considerable, and it is highly likely that far more lives would have been saved if the money had been invested instead in a wide range of more cost-effective risk mitigation programs. On the other hand, hardening of cockpit doors has an annual cost of only $800,00 per life saved, showing that this is a cost-effective security measure.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Kramer M(2004)The perils of counterinsurgency: Russia's war in Chechnya Int Secur 29 5-63
[2]  
Mandel DR(2005)Are risk assessments of a terrorist attack coherent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 277-288
[3]  
Melchers RE(2001)On the ALARP approach to risk management Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71 201-208
[4]  
Paté-Cornell ME(1994)Quantitative safety goals for risk management of industrial facilities Struct Saf 13 145-157
[5]  
Paté-Cornell ME(2002)Probabilistic modeling of terrorist threats: a systems analysis approach to setting priorities among counter-measures Mil Oper Res 7 5-23
[6]  
Guikema S(2008)Tangible and intangible benefits of transportation security measures Journal of Transport Security 1 3-14
[7]  
Prentice BE(2000)Acceptable risk criteria Prog Struct Eng Mater 2 254-262
[8]  
Reid SR(2008)Cost-effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies for protection of buildings against terrorist attack Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, American Society of Civil Engineers 22 115-120
[9]  
Stewart MG(1995)Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness Risk Anal 15 369-390
[10]  
Tengs TO(2000)The value of life in legal contexts: survey and critique Am Law Econ Rev 2 195-222