Detection of extraprostatic extension by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted combined with systemic template prostate biopsy

[1] Stephenson AJ(2005)Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol 23 7005-12

[2] Scardino PT(2019)Extraprostatic Extension in Core Biopsies epitomizes high-risk but locally treatable prostate Cancer Eur Urol Oncol 2 88-96

[3] Eastham JA(2021)The quantitative Assessment of using Multiparametric MRI for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis Front Oncol 11 771864-3

[4] Goldberg H(2010)Extraprostatic extension of prostatic adenocarcinoma on needle core biopsy: report of 72 cases with clinical follow-up BJU Int 106 330-8

[5] Ramiz AH(2016)Clinical findings and treatment outcomes in patients with extraprostatic extension identified on prostate biopsy J Urol 196 703-45

[6] Glicksman R(2016)Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate Cancer: a diagnostic Meta-analysis Eur Urol 70 233-50

[7] Li W(2015)Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Urol 68 438-7

[8] Sun Y(2015)Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 390-S96

[9] Wu Y(2018)Detection of extraprostatic disease and seminal vesicle invasion in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies Transl Androl Urol 7 392-07

[10] Lu F(2021)Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves perineural invasion detection Hum Pathol 117 101-93

[1] Stephenson AJ(2005)Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy J Clin Oncol 23 7005-12

[2] Scardino PT(2019)Extraprostatic Extension in Core Biopsies epitomizes high-risk but locally treatable prostate Cancer Eur Urol Oncol 2 88-96

[3] Eastham JA(2021)The quantitative Assessment of using Multiparametric MRI for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis Front Oncol 11 771864-3

[4] Goldberg H(2010)Extraprostatic extension of prostatic adenocarcinoma on needle core biopsy: report of 72 cases with clinical follow-up BJU Int 106 330-8

[5] Ramiz AH(2016)Clinical findings and treatment outcomes in patients with extraprostatic extension identified on prostate biopsy J Urol 196 703-45

[6] Glicksman R(2016)Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate Cancer: a diagnostic Meta-analysis Eur Urol 70 233-50

[7] Li W(2015)Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Urol 68 438-7

[8] Sun Y(2015)Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer JAMA 313 390-S96

[9] Wu Y(2018)Detection of extraprostatic disease and seminal vesicle invasion in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies Transl Androl Urol 7 392-07

[10] Lu F(2021)Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves perineural invasion detection Hum Pathol 117 101-93