Culture media influenced laboratory outcomes but not neonatal birth weight in assisted reproductive technology

被引:0
作者
Tai-lang Yin
Yi Zhang
Sai-jiao Li
Meng Zhao
Jin-li Ding
Wang-ming Xu
Jing Yang
机构
[1] Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Center of Reproductive Medicine
来源
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] | 2015年 / 35卷
关键词
culture medium; fertilization; embryo development; birth weight;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Whether the type of culture media utilized in assisted reproductive technology has impacts on laboratory outcomes and birth weight of newborns in in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was investigated. A total of 673 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI and giving birth to live singletons after fresh embryo transfer on day 3 from Jan. 1, 2010 to Dec. 31, 2012 were included. Three types of culture media were used during this period: Quinn’s Advantage (QA), Single Step Medium (SSM), and Continuous Single Culture medium (CSC). Fertilization rate (FR), normal fertilization rate (NFR), cleavage rate (CR), normal cleavage rate (NCR), good-quality embryo rate (GQER) and neonatal birth weight were compared using one-way ANOVA and χ2 tests. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of culture media on laboratory outcomes and birth weight. In IVF cycles, GQER was significantly decreased in SSM medium group as compared with QA or CSC media groups (63.6% vs. 69.0% in QA; vs. 71.3% in CSC, P=0.011). In ICSI cycles, FR, NFR and CR were significantly lower in CSC medium group than in other two media groups. No significant difference was observed in neonatal birthweight among the three groups (P=0.759). Multiple linear regression analyses confirmed that the type of culture medium was correlated with FR, NFR, CR and GQER, but not with neonatal birth weight. The type of culture media had potential influences on laboratory outcomes but did not exhibit an impact on the birth weight of singletons in ART.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 937
页数:5
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Sazonova A(2011)Obstetric outcome after Hum Reprod 26 442-450
[2]  
Kallen K(2004) fertilization with single or double embryo transfer Obstet Gynecol 103 551-563
[3]  
Thurin-Kjellberg A(2004)Perinatal outcomes in singletons following BMJ 328 261-353
[4]  
Jackson RA(2013) fertilization: a meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 19 330-104
[5]  
Gibson KA(2013)Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies Hum Reprod Update 19 87-310
[6]  
Wu YW(2013)Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril 99 303-55
[7]  
Helmerhorst FM(2015)Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 21 39-612
[8]  
Perquin DA(2010)Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility Hum Reprod 25 605-2074
[9]  
Donker D(2013)IVF culture media: past, present and future Hum Reprod 28 2067-669
[10]  
Hansen M(2014)Effect of Hum Reprod 29 661-3214