Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market

被引:0
|
作者
Mudassar Hasan
Muhammad Abubakr Naeem
Muhammad Arif
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
Xuan Vinh Vo
机构
[1] The University of Lahore,Lahore Business School
[2] University College Dublin,Smurfit Graduate School of Business
[3] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,Institute of Business Research
[4] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University,Department of Business Administration
[5] Montpellier Business School,Institute of Business Research and CFVG
[6] South Ural State University,undefined
[7] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,undefined
来源
Financial Innovation | / 8卷
关键词
Liquidity; Time–frequency connectedness; Cryptocurrencies; C10; C32; G01; G15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the dynamics of liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market. We use the connectedness models of Diebold and Yilmaz (Int J Forecast 28(1):57–66, 2012) and Baruník and Křehlík (J Financ Econom 16(2):271–296, 2018) on a sample of six major cryptocurrencies, namely, Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Monero (XMR), and Dash. Our static analysis reveals a moderate liquidity connectedness among our sample cryptocurrencies, whereas BTC and LTC play a significant role in connectedness magnitude. A distinct liquidity cluster is observed for BTC, LTC, and XRP, and ETH, XMR, and Dash also form another distinct liquidity cluster. The frequency domain analysis reveals that liquidity connectedness is more pronounced in the short-run time horizon than the medium- and long-run time horizons. In the short run, BTC, LTC, and XRP are the leading contributor to liquidity shocks, whereas, in the long run, ETH assumes this role. Compared with the medium term, a tight liquidity clustering is found in the short and long terms. The time-varying analysis indicates that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market increases over time, pointing to the possible effect of rising demand and higher acceptability for this unique asset. Furthermore, more pronounced liquidity connectedness patterns are observed over the short and long run, reinforcing that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market is a phenomenon dependent on the time–frequency connectedness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retail vs institutional investor attention in the cryptocurrency market
    Ozdamar, Melisa
    Sensoy, Ahmet
    Akdeniz, Levent
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2022, 81
  • [32] Towards Decentralized Adaptive Control of Cryptocurrency Liquidity via Auction
    Tang, Shuyang
    Chow, Sherman S. M.
    2023 IEEE 43RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS, ICDCS, 2023, : 910 - 919
  • [33] Price overreactions in the cryptocurrency market
    Caporale, Guglielmo Maria
    Plastun, Alex
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 46 (05) : 1137 - 1155
  • [34] Asymmetric News Effects on Cryptocurrency Liquidity: an Event Study Perspective
    Yue, Wei
    Zhang, Sijia
    Zhang, Qiang
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 41
  • [35] Liquidity uncertainty and Bitcoin's market microstructure
    Koutmos, Dimitrios
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 172 : 97 - 101
  • [36] Market efficiency of cryptocurrency: evidence from the Bitcoin market
    Yi, Eojin
    Yang, Biao
    Jeong, Minhyuk
    Sohn, Sungbin
    Ahn, Kwangwon
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [37] MEASURING LIQUIDITY ON STOCK MARKET: IMPACT ON LIQUIDITY RATIO
    Bogdan, Sinisa
    Baresa, Suzana
    Ivanovic, Sasa
    TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT-CROATIA, 2012, 18 (02): : 183 - 193
  • [38] Product market power and stock market liquidity
    Kale, Jayant R.
    Loon, Yee Cheng
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2011, 14 (02) : 376 - 410
  • [39] Momentum and contrarian effects on the cryptocurrency market
    Kosc, Krzysztof
    Sakowski, Pawel
    Slepaczuk, Robert
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 523 : 691 - 701
  • [40] Cryptocurrency market spillover in times of uncertainty
    Chen, Wei-Peng
    Wu, Chih-Chiang
    Aimable, Withz
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2025, 76