Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market

被引:0
|
作者
Mudassar Hasan
Muhammad Abubakr Naeem
Muhammad Arif
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
Xuan Vinh Vo
机构
[1] The University of Lahore,Lahore Business School
[2] University College Dublin,Smurfit Graduate School of Business
[3] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,Institute of Business Research
[4] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University,Department of Business Administration
[5] Montpellier Business School,Institute of Business Research and CFVG
[6] South Ural State University,undefined
[7] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,undefined
来源
Financial Innovation | / 8卷
关键词
Liquidity; Time–frequency connectedness; Cryptocurrencies; C10; C32; G01; G15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the dynamics of liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market. We use the connectedness models of Diebold and Yilmaz (Int J Forecast 28(1):57–66, 2012) and Baruník and Křehlík (J Financ Econom 16(2):271–296, 2018) on a sample of six major cryptocurrencies, namely, Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Monero (XMR), and Dash. Our static analysis reveals a moderate liquidity connectedness among our sample cryptocurrencies, whereas BTC and LTC play a significant role in connectedness magnitude. A distinct liquidity cluster is observed for BTC, LTC, and XRP, and ETH, XMR, and Dash also form another distinct liquidity cluster. The frequency domain analysis reveals that liquidity connectedness is more pronounced in the short-run time horizon than the medium- and long-run time horizons. In the short run, BTC, LTC, and XRP are the leading contributor to liquidity shocks, whereas, in the long run, ETH assumes this role. Compared with the medium term, a tight liquidity clustering is found in the short and long terms. The time-varying analysis indicates that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market increases over time, pointing to the possible effect of rising demand and higher acceptability for this unique asset. Furthermore, more pronounced liquidity connectedness patterns are observed over the short and long run, reinforcing that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market is a phenomenon dependent on the time–frequency connectedness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emotional spillovers in the cryptocurrency market
    Chowdhury, Md Iftekhar Hasan
    Hasan, Mudassar
    Bouri, Elie
    Tang, Yayan
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2024, 41
  • [22] Up or down? Short-term reversal, momentum, and liquidity effects in cryptocurrency markets
    Zaremba, Adam
    Bilgin, Mehmet Huseyin
    Long, Huaigang
    Mercik, Aleksander
    Szczygielski, Jan J.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 78
  • [23] Liquidity and market incompleteness
    Zurita, Felipe
    ANNALS OF FINANCE, 2008, 4 (03) : 299 - 303
  • [24] Uncertainty and Risk in the Cryptocurrency Market
    Almeida, Dora
    Dionisio, Andreia
    Vieira, Isabel
    Ferreira, Paulo
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (11)
  • [25] Feedback trading in the cryptocurrency market
    Ahmed, Mohamed Shaker
    Alsamman, Adel
    Chebbi, Kaouther
    STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024, 41 (01) : 46 - 63
  • [26] CRYPTOCURRENCY AND STOCK MARKET: INTERDEPENDENCE
    Kaur, Prabhjot
    Meena, Mukesh Kumar
    JIMS8M-THE JOURNAL OF INDIAN MANAGEMENT & STRATEGY, 2022, 27 (04) : 33 - 37
  • [27] LIQUIDITY AND MARKET PARTICIPATION
    WILLIAMSON, SD
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1994, 18 (3-4) : 629 - 670
  • [28] Liquidity in the repo market
    Fuhrer, Lucas Marc
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2018, 84 : 1 - 22
  • [29] Liquidity and market efficiency
    Chordia, Tarun
    Roll, Richard
    Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (02) : 249 - 268
  • [30] LIQUIDITY IN A BINOMIAL MARKET
    Goekay, Selim
    Soner, Halil Mete
    MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2012, 22 (02) : 250 - 276