Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market

被引:0
|
作者
Mudassar Hasan
Muhammad Abubakr Naeem
Muhammad Arif
Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
Xuan Vinh Vo
机构
[1] The University of Lahore,Lahore Business School
[2] University College Dublin,Smurfit Graduate School of Business
[3] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,Institute of Business Research
[4] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University,Department of Business Administration
[5] Montpellier Business School,Institute of Business Research and CFVG
[6] South Ural State University,undefined
[7] University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City,undefined
来源
Financial Innovation | / 8卷
关键词
Liquidity; Time–frequency connectedness; Cryptocurrencies; C10; C32; G01; G15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the dynamics of liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market. We use the connectedness models of Diebold and Yilmaz (Int J Forecast 28(1):57–66, 2012) and Baruník and Křehlík (J Financ Econom 16(2):271–296, 2018) on a sample of six major cryptocurrencies, namely, Bitcoin (BTC), Litecoin (LTC), Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), Monero (XMR), and Dash. Our static analysis reveals a moderate liquidity connectedness among our sample cryptocurrencies, whereas BTC and LTC play a significant role in connectedness magnitude. A distinct liquidity cluster is observed for BTC, LTC, and XRP, and ETH, XMR, and Dash also form another distinct liquidity cluster. The frequency domain analysis reveals that liquidity connectedness is more pronounced in the short-run time horizon than the medium- and long-run time horizons. In the short run, BTC, LTC, and XRP are the leading contributor to liquidity shocks, whereas, in the long run, ETH assumes this role. Compared with the medium term, a tight liquidity clustering is found in the short and long terms. The time-varying analysis indicates that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market increases over time, pointing to the possible effect of rising demand and higher acceptability for this unique asset. Furthermore, more pronounced liquidity connectedness patterns are observed over the short and long run, reinforcing that liquidity connectedness in the cryptocurrency market is a phenomenon dependent on the time–frequency connectedness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Determinants of liquidity in cryptocurrency markets
    J. Christopher Westland
    Digital Finance, 2023, 5 (2): : 261 - 293
  • [12] Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets
    Ji, Qiang
    Bouri, Elie
    Lau, Chi Keung Marco
    Roubaud, David
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 63 : 257 - 272
  • [13] Property market liquidity and REIT liquidity
    Downs, David H.
    Zhu, Bing
    REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2022, 50 (06) : 1462 - 1491
  • [14] Cryptocurrency market microstructure: a systematic literature review
    Almeida, Jose
    Goncalves, Tiago Cruz
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 332 (1-3) : 1035 - 1068
  • [15] Do liquidity enhancement auctions improve the market liquidity in the JGB market?
    Hattori, Takahiro
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 183
  • [16] Psychological barriers in the cryptocurrency market
    Fonseca, Vitor
    Pacheco, Luis
    Lobao, Julio
    REVIEW OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2020, 12 (02) : 151 - 169
  • [17] Analysis of cryptocurrency connectedness based on network to transaction volume ratios
    Christian M. Hafner
    Sabrine Majeri
    Digital Finance, 2022, 4 (2-3): : 187 - 216
  • [18] On the dynamic equicorrelations in cryptocurrency market
    Demiralay, Sercan
    Golitsis, Petros
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2021, 80 : 524 - 533
  • [19] Cryptocurrency regulation and market quality
    Griffith, Todd
    Clancey-Shang, Danjue
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2023, 84
  • [20] Testing for herding in the cryptocurrency market
    Ballis, Antonis
    Drakos, Konstantinos
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 33